Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Name one thing you would go without or stop doing until we win a SB


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

You're not wrong but once they can google "boobs" unsupervised the rest is in God's hands

Remember the days when you had to go to the corner store and purchase a magazine without looking in the eyes of the cashier. Kids got it easy these days

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

How bout all the huddle and all of humanity stop saying he's got that dawg in him. Think I'd take the horse dildo to never here that again. Once we win the super bowl, you can dog pound each other into oblivion.

Recent chest x-ray of Bryce Young.  You can plainly see here that he does, indeed, got a little dawg in him. 

doginhim.jpg

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MechaZain said:

You're not wrong but once they can google "boobs" unsupervised the rest is in God's hands

Fortunately there’s filters and parental controls until they figure out how to remove those lol. Also, if they google boobs it’s on them, you know what you’re getting. Some unfortunate kid who opens this thread on a football forum, however, does not. Disappointed in it being allowed to remain so long tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WUnderhill said:

Fortunately there’s filters and parental controls until they figure out how to remove those lol. Also, if they google boobs it’s on them, you know what you’re getting. Some unfortunate kid who opens this thread on a football forum, however, does not. Disappointed in it being allowed to remain so long tbh.

there’s a couple of things going on here.

First the posting of dildos in general has been commonplace on here for a while. “This thread is dildos” was a mantra for a long time, which then spawned a flood of dildo pics. If a rule is implemented not to post dildo pics or say the word dildo, i will of course follow it. This is a topic that has been used freely on this site as long as I’ve been here.

Second is the idea that human sexuality is somehow a bad or dirty thing and people should be sheltered from it. Human sexuality, bad words, and a number of other “taboo” topics are only made such by the fact that someone decided to define it that way. My wife is Bhutanese, and many houses and temples have giant pictures of male genitalia painted on them, many even squirting. Other cultures have large portions of their society dedicated to human sexuality. Does Bhutan have outrageous numbers of sexual predators. No. No one thinks twice about it because they weren’t taught it was bad. It’s a part of their culture. The only sex crimes i’ve heard about in the years i’ve been involved with their culture have been committed by foreigners. 

Whether you think it is dirty or healthy to talk about human sexuality, the idea that kids can’t see it everywhere is naive. Half of social media is some woman showing 90% of her cleavage and shaking her butt for clicks. You can say that my post is just part of the problem. To this i ask, what problem? Exploitation of women? I agree that the 18-20somethings who are jiggling their bits is a problem. I don’t click on those. I do my best to avoid them, but they still constantly pop up in my list of recommended videos. Black Widow being dressed in a skin tight jumpsuit with the top zipped halfway down her front is openly exploiting her sexuality, but that’s fine. My post was a clearly mature adult woman showing a toy. No one was exploited. There were a bazillion pics of bad dragon dildos to choose from, many of which were exploitative in nature.

So, what problem are you going after here? I can give you millions of examples of freely accepted, wildly available exploitation of women, much worse than a picture that’s just a bigger version of a sex toy that every child in the country can see on the shelves at Target. I agree exploitation of women is a huge problem in every culture i’ve ever seen. I have two daughters, and this concept is top of my mind every day. As responsible parents, i think it is important to teach the value of every individual, and how to avoid exploitative behavior. But human sexuality is not by default exploitation.

If you want to talk about any of this further, we can move it into the Tinderbox.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

there’s a couple of things going on here.

First the posting of dildos in general has been commonplace on here for a while. “This thread is dildos” was a mantra for a long time, which then spawned a flood of dildo pics. If a rule is implemented not to post dildo pics or say the word dildo, i will of course follow it. This is a topic that has been used freely on this site as long as I’ve been here.

Second is the idea that human sexuality is somehow a bad or dirty thing and people should be sheltered from it. Human sexuality, bad words, and a number of other “taboo” topics are only made such by the fact that someone decided to define it that way. My wife is Bhutanese, and many houses and temples have giant pictures of male genitalia painted on them, many even squirting. Other cultures have large portions of their society dedicated to human sexuality. Does Bhutan have outrageous numbers of sexual predators. No. No one thinks twice about it because they weren’t taught it was bad. It’s a part of their culture. The only sex crimes i’ve heard about in the years i’ve been involved with their culture have been committed by foreigners. 

Whether you think it is dirty or healthy to talk about human sexuality, the idea that kids can’t see it everywhere is naive. Half of social media is some woman showing 90% of her cleavage and shaking her butt for clicks. You can say that my post is just part of the problem. To this i ask, what problem? Exploitation of women? I agree that the 18-20somethings who are jiggling their bits is a problem. I don’t click on those. I do my best to avoid them, but they still constantly pop up in my list of recommended videos. Black Widow being dressed in a skin tight jumpsuit with the top zipped halfway down her front is openly exploiting her sexuality, but that’s fine. My post was a clearly mature adult woman showing a toy. No one was exploited. There were a bazillion pics of bad dragon dildos to choose from, many of which were exploitative in nature.

So, what problem are you going after here? I can give you millions of examples of freely accepted, wildly available exploitation of women, much worse than a picture that’s just a bigger version of a sex toy that every child in the country can see on the shelves at Target. I agree exploitation of women is a huge problem in every culture i’ve ever seen. I have two daughters, and this concept is top of my mind every day. As responsible parents, i think it is important to teach the value of every individual, and how to avoid exploitative behavior. But human sexuality is not by default exploitation.

If you want to talk about any of this further, we can move it into the Tinderbox.

Wtf are you even talking about. I’ve been around here a long time and don’t recall seeing a giant picture of a sex toy with a URL to a porn site until now. But it’s ok to put that on a football forum that is not age restricted and in which children would have no expectation to open a thread and see it because other stuff happens other places and cultures and marvel movies and whatever else wtf are you even talking about. Saying because kids can potentially see it elsewhere does not mean it belongs here what kind of nonsense is that. I don’t care to talk to you about it feel free to put it on the tinderbox if you want, that’s where people expect to see that kind of crap. You’ve said all you need in defending the idea that you don’t care whether somebody else’s kid would unknowingly stumble across what you posted. Yeah yeah fertility sexuality other cultures bla bla bla. It’s a mod issue at this point and it’s messed up that it hasn’t been removed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...