Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive Line struggles


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

I understand 99.9 % of you are having a meltdown over the O Line ..  but why I’m not hearing just as much concern over the defense baffles me . Time of possession in the first half was crucial. 
Yes the offense never moved the ball,, but the defense was not giving us any 3 and outs. 
 

Even with with 80-100 players playing, giving up 27 points was embarrassing.  
 

Glad this was preseason. 

Edited by OceanPanther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

I listened to Bill Polian on NFL radio recap what he saw from the joint practice with the Jets.  He said that Young reminds of Manning, will make mistakes as a rookie but will be a top QB for years to come.

What really caught my ear was that He also noted that our offensive line seemed to struggle against stunts that the Jets Defensive Line was rushing with. It’s exactly what I just saw in the preseason game as they couldn’t protect Bryce Young.  It’s concerning to me that they didn’t learn anything from the Wednesday practice.  
 

Yes it’s preseason but you want to see growth, and learning from mistakes. Jets have a top 5 defense but I expected more from the OL today.

This was something that caught my eye early (Jets and stunting DL) and was excited to see how Campen would coach the OL up to handle it going forward. The league is a copycat league, and the Jets showed success early on using stunts to get to Bryce.

It looks like teams are content to use stunts to whack Bryce as he holds on to the ball in the same way they were okay with defenders "risking" roughing the passer penalties against Cam.

Very eager to see how Reich, Caldwell, Brown, McCown, and Campen address that, especially if we see more of it in the next preseason game. I could see teams using stunts to create pressure up the middle so that Bryce is unable to step up like we would scream for the Panthers' defense to do vs. Brees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Icege said:

looks like teams are content to use stunts to whack Bryce as he holds on to the ball in the same way they were okay with defenders "risking" roughing the passer penalties against Cam.

Them stunting has nothing to do with Bryce holding onto the ball. He actually got rid of the ball very quickly but offensive line couldn’t give him any time to let routes develop downfield 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

understand 99.9 % of you are having a meltdown over the O Line ..  but why I’m not hearing just as much concern over the defense baffles me

Because we’re more concerned about keeping Bryce Young healthy and giving him a fair chance to succeed in the NFL.  Defenses  adjust easier than offensive lines

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...