Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football 2023


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm gonna need to see Hunter put up big performances against a non-trash D before I start entertaining any talk of taking him over Harrison Jr.

Well he’s only a Sophomore so he’s not draft eligible but Deion stated that Hunter is better than he was at the same age.

Could be coach speak but Deion doesn’t seem to roll like that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Duke dominated that half but shot themselves in the dick so many times they go to half trailing 7-6.

I wouldn’t call it dominating.  Clemson just once again has no offense.  The one thing Dabo had to fix….still looks DJUish. 

Duke QB completing 50% of his passes.  Duke RBs got 11 yards.   
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't be overstated how important this game is for us which makes Johns' conservative ass playcalling even more frustrating than it usually is. This would be Duke's first top 10 win (at the time of play, Duke beat tech in 2014) since 1989, ironically also against Clemson. This could be a legitimately program-altering victory with our new AD showing interest in investing more into football and we've outplayed them the whole first half and are still down entirely thanks to our own mistakes. The self-inflicted errors have to be cleaned up if want any shot at winning . Absolutely NEED a good opening drive to start the 2nd half. 

Edited by beo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I was about to say, Clemson fans gotta be at least a tad nervous that here is another QB that looked really promising in spot duty as a freshman looking pretty trashy as the anointed starter.

Really been unimpressed with the playcalling given the hype of Garrett Riley too.  The bullshit quick screen game is too similar to last seasons nonsense. 
 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Duke dominated that half but shot themselves in the dick so many times they go to half trailing 7-6.

Duke returns 18 starters from a 9-4 team. They , once again will be better than most give them credit for. Clempson may be great again, and Duke just better than most think. Clempson has not run over them on offense or defense.

A lot of football left for Clempson to shine ( or Duke ) 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...