Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 2 NFL games


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

David Carr through his full career showed that wasn't a sustainable model.

(Joe Burrow is showing it too)

For sure it’s not a great way to play. And he’s on pace for more sacks than anyone ever in a season… but if he can perform in dire conditions then there really isn’t any excuse for others to not step up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Varking said:

For sure it’s not a great way to play. And he’s on pace for more sacks than anyone ever in a season… but if he can perform in dire conditions then there really isn’t any excuse for others to not step up. 

He's already got a shoulder injury. Couldn't throw at all this week up till today.

That's a huge concern for a quarterback, especially after just one game.

(remember what shoulder issues did to Newton)

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Tua is a good example of what a successful Bryce Young will look like. I think Bryce is a little more mobile but both of their arms are NFL average at best. They're gonna win with a quick release, accuracy, anticipation, and timing, not threading the needle with lasers.

Fair, Tua is pretty darn good right now though, so come on Bryce show that potential! 😄

Edited by Jaxel
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Not sure why the NFL keeps giving the Patriots Nat'l TV games. Their run is over. Nobody wants to see Mac Jones with no weapons.

BB has been exposed without Brady. He's just another coach at this point.

maybe because they have one of the largest fan base out of all of the NFL teams? haha. 

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Not sure why the NFL keeps giving the Patriots Nat'l TV games. Their run is over. Nobody wants to see Mac Jones with no weapons.

BB has been exposed without Brady. He's just another coach at this point.

 

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

maybe because they have one of the largest fan base out of all of the NFL teams? haha. 

And the rest of us love watching them lose.  😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...