Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 2 NFL games


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Ridder with 2 GWD. Can Bryce keep up with Ridder, Carr and Mayfield?

Green Bay had several interception drops today against Ridder, at least one should have been a pick 6, missed opportunity’s. We do need to win vs NO’s, but Bryce will be fine. When we look at this draft in which we got a starting quarterback and perhaps a starting Offensive lineman I still feel good about this Panther team. I hope this all star coaching team proves their worth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ickmule said:

Panthers took the wrong QB. most will finally admit it by years end. 

LOL we have NO playmakers for Bryce so i guess its the QB fault. How long before you figured out Rhule was the wrong coach? I stated he was the wrong HC when he was immediately hired. That clown blamed Bridgewater cause Teddy question why the team doesn't practice 2 min situational plays and traded him away by including picks unload him LOL. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GhostWhispah said:

LOL we have NO playmakers for Bryce so i guess its the QB fault. How long before you figured out Rhule was the wrong coach? I stated he was the wrong HC when he was immediately hired. That clown blamed Bridgewater cause Teddy question why the team doesn't practice 2 min situational plays and traded him away by including picks unload him LOL. 

I wish the mods would ban him. He has been nothing but a downer troll. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GhostWhispah said:

LOL we have NO playmakers for Bryce so i guess its the QB fault. How long before you figured out Rhule was the wrong coach? I stated he was the wrong HC when he was immediately hired. That clown blamed Bridgewater cause Teddy question why the team doesn't practice 2 min situational plays and traded him away by including picks unload him LOL. 

What was your past Alias when you stated this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Chargers had one of the best qb's in the NFL for many years (Rivers) with nothing to show for it.  Now they have one of the best qb's in the NFL, and they still look inept.  

A QB is a HUGE piece of the puzzle but not the only piece. Just look at Stafford winning a SB immediately in LA after the Lions floundered with him for years. For that matter, look at Brees with the Saints after getting away from the Chargers. Would Rivers have done similarly in the same situation? Probably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A QB is a HUGE piece of the puzzle but not the only piece. Just look at Stafford winning a SB immediately in LA after the Lions floundered with him for years.

I know.  But you would think that with Rivers and now Herbert, the Chargers would have stumbled their way into at least one Super Bowl.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...