Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fitterer's Draft History


BIGH2001
 Share

Recommended Posts

Remember when posters here said he wasn't qualified for the job when he was hired and then again this offseason? The whole 'he deserves a chance' angle is looking like the fantasy it awalys was. His roster building is trash and losing Morgan doesn't look like much of a loss outside of nostalgia. GM, HC and owner. Directionless mess with too many dummies failing at every angle. It's a mess and it's hard to imagine next time will be any better than the last 2.

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Remember when posters here said he wasn't qualified for the job when he was hired and then again this offseason? The whole 'he deserves a chance' angle is looking like the fantasy it awalys was. His roster building is teash and losing Morgan doesn't look like much of a loss outside of nostalgia. GM, HC and owner. Directionless mess with too many dummies failing at every angle. It's a mess and it's hard to imagine next time will be any better than the last 2.

I wonder if mr scott is still willing to die on the scott fitterer hill?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I wonder if mr scott is still willing to die on the scott fitterer hill?

Untill he doesn't. I'm over fighting with fans about how they fan. Cope how you will. I don't have any will to argue about what fans wish was true. Fritz should have left with Rhule, Frank is a hasbeen who was way overvalued while undervaluing his negatives and Tepper only hires failures so far so I have zero hope that will change until it does.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...