Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just how BAD is Bryce Young?

BrisbanePanther

By BrisbanePanther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Frank9999 Experienced

Frank9999

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

tua was coming off a major injury.  Clausen looked like hot garbage his first year, as did zack wilson, as did darnold etc

 

damn this game is fun to play

Still only 3 games. Whats the point in trying to predict his career off 3 games? Im just saying its way too early still

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frank9999 Experienced

Frank9999

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mike in Raleigh said:

Who the f knows? He's played 3 games under an incompetent leadership structure. I can't  make a judgment call based on everything else we've seen.

Right this is where I am. Fitterer doesnt know what hes doing and Reich seems like a joke

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Frank9999 said:

Just saying its way too early to really come to conclusions on Bryce. Fitterer has really did this team an injustice by having this half ass roster 

Yes and no, obviously it's clearly too early to come to any conclusion on him as a player.

But the more we lose, the more it raises the stakes on what he has to become in his career for it to be a successful pick.

If we give the Bears a Top 2 pick, Bryce then needs to win us a SB and likely be a HOFer for that trade to ever be deemed a success.  Just no other way to slice it if we end up giving away Caleb or Maye (or Sanders) on top of all the other assets we had to give up to get Bryce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
96Bravo Proficient

96Bravo

Posted
Posted

Now that I've finally seen the footage (couldn't watch the game here in Portland), I like a lot of what I saw from Bryce. Seems he made quicker decisions. Still holds on to the ball a bit. I wish someone other than Thielen was open. Maybe they are and we're not throwing to them. The pocket look cleaner than in Seattle. A running game would certainly help. It looked like Sanders made a better receiver than RB. 

Obviously, we should have capitalized in the red zone. That would have made a big difference. But I feel like Bryce looked a lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
96Bravo Proficient

96Bravo

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

It's way too early to know how bad or good Young will be. That said, it's not looking good at this time, but the Panthers are about as bad a situation as a rookie QB could have been put into.

It's sad because it looked like he being put in a great situation before the season started. A line that was very good last season. Veteran receivers. A new RB who had more than 1000 yards last season. An improved TE. Experienced coaching staff. 

Disaster so far.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Camp Fodder Mentor

Camp Fodder

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Yes and no, obviously it's clearly too early to come to any conclusion on him as a player.

But the more we lose, the more it raises the stakes on what he has to become in his career for it to be a successful pick.

If we give the Bears a Top 2 pick, Bryce then needs to win us a SB and likely be a HOFer for that trade to ever be deemed a success.  Just no other way to slice it if we end up giving away Caleb or Maye (or Sanders) on top of all the other assets we had to give up to get Bryce.

But Scott Fitterer told us they don’t plan on picking in the top 10 for a long time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MartyClemons Contributor

MartyClemons

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Frank9999 said:

Tua looked like hot garbage his rookie year. 
 

i still believe in Bryce. Hes in a shitty situation 

I’ve seen this a couple times and I don’t really get it. Tua was 6-3 with a 2:1 TD to INT ratio. Young’s stats have been horrendous. And I don’t even think that fully does it justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bear Hands
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Per Adam Schefter: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1920523706624823739 Expected, but just want to rub it in here.
    • MHS831
      Clowney released

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts.  You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well.  Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense:     In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.
    • PNW_PantherMan
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The rise of analytics in sports goes back to the use of sabermetrics in baseball.  The ironic thing is that the whole point of Bill James work was to objectively figure out each players contribution to to a team's wins throughout the season.  This is possible in baseball because each at bat is essentially a 1v1 with an objective outcome.  Applying statistical averages also works a lot better with hundreds of plate appearances over 162 games a year. PFF grades plays subjectively, and then puts them into buckets.  They then create different statistics based on those buckets.  That's all well and good and I'm not saying it's useless.  But calling it analytics like it's some kind of objective science is a far cry from what is actually going on.
×
×
  • Create New...