Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers actively shopping for a WR


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Good lord. 

Well draft picks are utterly useless to us while Fitterer’s in charge so go ahead and trade them. However this FO has proved enough times they have no idea how to address the WR position. Also thought trading our best WR was a good idea 

I’m all for trading for a WR but I’d like the guy doing the trading to have a clue and that’s not Scott

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ONLY WR that is game changing enough and worth further draft capital to make a dent is Davante Adams, but why in the world would he want to play with a dumpster fire team again if leaving LV. You're getting Davante solely for the purpose to help transition Young to the NFL and not have him completely broken before his career even starts.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

The ONLY WR that is game changing enough and worth further draft capital to make a dent is Davante Adams, but why in the world would he want to play with a dumpster fire team again if leaving LV. You're getting Davante solely for the purpose to help transition Young to the NFL and not have him completely broken before his career even starts.

 

Only issue with Adams is he’s going to be 31 in 2.5 months

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Castavar said:

Tee Higgins and a 1st for Brian Burns would be the ONLY option I would entertain.

After all the bum ass trades Fitterer has done, DO NOT let him make any more fuggin trades. He has wasted so many of our assets, he clearly does not recognize talent.

No way Cincy includes a 1 with Higgins for Burns.

That one would be closer to a straight up player swap I think

Quite frankly, I think I’d be fine with that. 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...