Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just speculating... I wouldn't be surprised if Frank or Fitt is fired soon. Very soon.


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, frankw said:

Mr. Scot has his ways but I don't think we should be pushing him out the door. He has value as a contributor.

That being said. The propensity for being a company line man when it suits him makes me feel like my eyes are going to roll right back into my head. Especially when it comes to the subject of Scott Fitterer whom apparently is not a "bad" GM in his eyes which absolutely astounds me considering the venom he's had for Hurney. Say what you want about Marty at least he did draft some All-Pro caliber players along the way. I'm still waiting to see the first one from Fitterer. We need a new front office.

Only member on my block list. He's no problem for me. I think he's a older guy so I think people should cut him some slack or just simply block him like I did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not real clear on what's "company line" about accepting that Thomas Brown wrote the playbook when he himself says he did.

lot of orgs set narratives publicly that aren't actually the reality of things inside.  For a host of reasons.  Heck, most isn't fair.  Everyone does variations of it. 

Brown also said during the early PR campaign on Brown when he was hired and wasn't allowed to actually be the full OC that "his" offense would be a blend of what the Rams did and what Frank in Indy did.   The one he was going to build from the ground up in a handful of short weeks. And that blend, just happens to be a legit clone of Frank's O.   The O Frank and not Brown would be calling. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

I lost an avatar. But was proven correct about what the bet was about.  That Joe Brady wasn't the primary issue.  Matt Rhule was. 

I mean, the Joe Brady window was still the best offensive window the Matt Rhule era ever saw.  He was your boogeyman.  Matt Rhule and you needed him to be in order for the Matt Rhule charade to keep going.   Thankfully Matt Rhule proved me right beyond a shadow of a doubt (well, one doubt it appears is still being clung to lol). 

 

You can't even remember what the bet was about.  It was long after Brady was gone.

smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, poundaway said:

You can't even remember what the bet was about.  It was long after Brady was gone.

smh

lol, you intentionally don’t seem to be able to acknowledge why Brady was ever discussed between you and I.   People like you were scapegoating THE primary problem.  Joe Brady wasn’t it.  That was always the core of that convo.   Firing Brady wouldn’t solve anything.  And it didn’t.  Proven fact.  We actually got worse.  

I can see it now.  You probably watching Nebraska games rooting for Matt Rhule to show us!! Come on Rhule!   But it’s always the same.  Matt Rhule teams have bad offenses.  Because of Matt Rhule. 

But I’m done talking about your champion Matt Rhule.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Weird argument. Scott is taking Brown's word as truth, and others argue that Brown's not telling the truth with no real evidence to back it. And who's pushing a narrative here? 🤔 

Some people love a good conspiracy theory. I mean Brown was breaking down how they both developed this whole offense and playbook and how he took part of what he learned from McVay. I doubt there is zero truth in that whole interview. I think some people are just bored and arguing nonsense for shits and giggles. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

So all you blokes running Mr Scott down here would walk straight up to Thomas Brown and call him a liar? 

I call it PR.  Crafting narrative and perception.  Literally something every company does.  Do you think the Panthers tell the public actually what is going on in that building? Do you think any team actually does that.   It is just a fact coaches and NFL teams get asked a billion questions and they choose not to give the actual truth.  And I'm not even argue they should.  No companies really do that. 

We hired Frank Reich.  Who from the jump was going to call plays.  And our offense is a clone of what he did in Indy and SD.    A literal clone.  That comes with a lot of the same problems that popped up in SD and Indy with it. 

I do believe Thomas Brown when he says his O would be a blend of Frank's and what he did with the Rams.  Because it's Frank's offense.  That what we have seen with our own eyes. That's not really debatable.  And he is tinkering with it.  The tinkering is the blend.   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Some people love a good conspiracy theory. I mean Brown was breaking down how they both developed this whole offense and playbook and how he took part of what he learned from McVay. I doubt there is zero truth in that whole interview. I think some people are just bored and arguing nonsense for shits and giggles. 

The problem as I see it is that mr scot seems to believe what he wants to believe when he sees fit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Some people love a good conspiracy theory. I mean Brown was breaking down how they both developed this whole offense and playbook and how he took part of what he learned from McVay. I doubt there is zero truth in that whole interview. I think some people are just bored and arguing nonsense for shits and giggles. 

that's the thing.  No one has claimed their is zero truth to it.  That's what NFL teams do.  They use partial truths.  They set narratives.  Images.  etc. 

I mean, if you want to argue Brown on his own built an offense that just happened to be a clone of Frank's on his own accord then so be it.   But what we rolled out this season has been Frank's offense. Are there tweaks to it? Sure.  That's what the offensive staff does.  And that happens every year in an offense.  I'm sure Brown has been busy adding his touches to it. 

But to deny the core of what the 2023 Panthers have built isn't Frank's offense? That's just denying what is on the field.  Because it's the same thing Frank ran in Indy and SD.  That's the bulk of what we have seen.  Not McVay's O.  Not even much of a blend.  It's been heavily weighted in one direction.  Frank. And it's why people were begging and dreaming when it was announced we would hopefully start to see some of that classic McVay stuff start to show. 

Statements from NFL teams are fine.  Actions matter more.  And the 2023 Panthers have been running Frank's core O.  Maybe Thomas Brown (the first time OC who wasn't allowed to come in here and call plays) wanted to do that all on his own through no influence of Frank.  But that gets hard to believe that he would come from the McVay tree and insist and mimicking so heavily what Frank has done for years.  Considering they didn't know each other or have ties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CRA said:

that's the thing.  No one has claimed their is zero truth to it.  That's what NFL teams do.  They use partial truths.  They set narratives.  Images.  etc. 

I mean, if you want to argue Brown on his own built an offense that just happened to be a clone of Frank's on his own accord then so be it.   But what we rolled out this season has been Frank's offense. Are there tweaks to it? Sure.  That's what the offensive staff does.  And that happens every year in an offense.  I'm sure Brown has been busy adding his touches to it. 

But to deny the core of what the 2023 Panthers have built isn't Frank's offense? That's just denying what is on the field.  Because it's the same thing Frank ran in Indy and SD.  That's the bulk of what we have seen.  Not McVay's O.  Not even much of a blend.  It's been heavily weighted in one direction.  Frank. And it's why people were begging and dreaming when it was announced we would hopefully start to see some of that classic McVay stuff start to show. 

Statements from NFL teams are fine.  Actions matter more.  And the 2023 Panthers have been running Frank's core O.  Maybe Thomas Brown (the first time OC who wasn't allowed to come in here and call plays) wanted to do that all on his own through no influence of Frank.  But that gets hard to believe that he would come from the McVay tree and insist and mimicking so heavily what Frank has done for years.  Considering they didn't know each other or have ties. 

He didn’t build it on his on. They both claim to have built it together. There are absolutely parts of Reich’s offense in it. I just don’t think Brown is lying saying he had a big part in creating it. Remember Reich was calling plays the first 6 games so he probably leaned on the ones he liked/created. We only saw one game of Brown calling plays. 
I’m not wasting pages arguing with you about what was stated and what is true or not. Im just saying if he spent an entire interview explaining how he helped created this offense and playbook with Reich I doubt he is just making poo up. It’s such a pointless lie to elaborate that much on. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

He didn’t build it on his on. They both claim to have built it together. There are absolutely parts of Reich’s offense in it. I just don’t think Brown is lying saying he had a big part in creating it. Remember Reich was calling plays the first 6 games so he probably leaned on the ones he liked/created. We only saw one game of Brown calling plays. 
I’m not wasting pages arguing with you about what was stated and what is true or not. Im just saying if he spent an entire interview explaining how he helped created this offense and playbook with Reich I doubt he is just making poo up. It’s such a pointless lie to elaborate that much on. 

I argued he didn't build this O on his own from the ground.  That's PR fluff.  And that's what folks were saying yesterday.  That doesn't pass even the most basic eyeball test. 

They took Frank's core O and installed it.  Which makes sense given Frank was going to come in and call plays and Brown has never been an OC. Then have been attempting to tweak it.  It sure as heck needs it.    But it's largely to date just been vintage Frank's O.  That's my only point.  With the same problems his O routinely saw in every spot it's been run. To deny that, means to ignore what this football team has done on the field to date. 

and I have largely championed Brown should of been allowed to do whatever he wanted from day 1 because I don't like Frank's O and Frank sucks calling the O..... and we need way more of the McVay influence.  Because on the year, there has been very very little of it.  Hopefully we see more and more change and get further away from Frank's bread and butter.    

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
    • I dont know. He seems like a bigger douche now than ever. I didnt hate him for being a great player.
×
×
  • Create New...