Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns statline: 2 tackles, 0 sacks


Recommended Posts

I don't think people realize we might lose Burns for nothing.

 

Assuming he still has a market, who is going to trade a 1st and give him a new contract?

 

It has to be a team on the verge of being legit contenders to make the kind of move. Lions seem like the most probable team imo. Even then they have to really love Burns to make that kind of move.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I don't think people realize we might lose Burns for nothing.

 

Assuming he still has a market, who is going to trade a 1st and give him a new contract?

 

It has to be a team on the verge of being legit contenders to make the kind of move. Lions seem like the most probable team imo. Even then they have to really love Burns to make that kind of move.

 

 

 

Would they trade st brown for him? Ignore the fact that we could have just drafted him instead of tmj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be curious to see the advanced pass rush analytics on him from this game, but I have no idea where to find that stuff.

Definitely saw him affect Tua on multiple plays, sometimes you just don't get home, especially against the best offense in football right now.

Having said that, he's unfortunately for himself proven he's not deserving of Bosa money like he wanted, which if anything I think makes it more likely a team will give up good assets to get him, they think they'll be able to sign him for less than he originally wanted.  

He's still an elite pass rusher, but like everything else with this team, I'm sure we're not using him correctly and putting him on a team with better players, particularly at DB, it will unlock him and he'll go nuts.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

Phins also out 2 starters today on the OL.  Including the LT who Burns saw 

As an App State alum, seeing Burns get held from having a sack by a former UDFA from App State just makes me smile. MFer wants $30M but is easily game planned against, like today 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...