Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marquis Haynes Sr. ?

Tomcatn

By Tomcatn,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

d-dave Grand Master

d-dave

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Talking about "potential" in a guy who is 29 this season is a little silly.  All wishes for a full recovery to the guy, but he's a JAG.

I'd say he's a JAG++, as someone who has been a pretty decent situational rusher the past few years.  I'm not expecting him to save the season by any means, but he's actually a halfway decent pass rusher to rotate in situationally.

I mean, consider that we haven't even gotten a single sack from Houston - maybe we just need someone else.

Please pardon my rose tinted spectacles...  It's just who I am.  If you're more interest in trashing the team: "Panthers suck, fire everyone, trade everyone! We are the worstest evar!!!"

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, d-dave said:

I'd say he's a JAG++, as someone who has been a pretty decent situational rusher the past few years.  I'm not expecting him to save the season by any means, but he's actually a halfway decent pass rusher to rotate in situationally.

I mean, consider that we haven't even gotten a single sack from Houston - maybe we just need someone else.

Please pardon my rose tinted spectacles...  It's just who I am.  If you're more interest in trashing the team: "Panthers suck, fire everyone, trade everyone! We are the worstest evar!!!"

I'm sorry you missed the point.  Haynes is what he is at this point.  There is no "potential" to tap into.

I'm sorry you've mistaken me for someone who is a Panthers trasher.  I am definitely a Panthers realist.  I prefer to look at what is really happening; not what any rose colored glasses tell me, and certainly not what the negative masses tell me.

Haynes has shown us who he is.  He's on his second contract, one which the Panthers had no competition for his signature on.  Not even from the Washington Riverboats.  He has 1338 snaps in his career, making 83 tackles and 13 sacks.

By way of comparison, Mike Rucker was a good - not great - defensive end for us.  After five years of his career he had 244 tackles and 36.5 sacks.  Charles Johnson - good not great - 153 tackles and 31 sacks after five years.

Haynes is the dictionary definition of a JAG.  Doesn't mean he can't or won't contribute, just means he's an average NFL player.  Every team has them, every team needs them.  But you don't lay your hopes on a guy at this stage of their career suddenly becoming a solution.  He's just a rotational piece we employ because you can't have a roster full of studs.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr Mojo Risin Mentor

Mr Mojo Risin

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, BrianS said:

Talking about "potential" in a guy who is 29 this season is a little silly.  All wishes for a full recovery to the guy, but he's a JAG.

FWIW, Mario Addison was in a similar spot with us and finally became a full time starter in his age 30 season. Up to that point he was a pass rush specialist in a similar role as Haynes has been so far. Not saying we can rely on him becoming a good player at age 29+ like Addison but it is definitely possible he just needs to get on the field.

Edited by Mr Mojo Risin
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Grand Master

d-dave

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BrianS said:

I'm sorry you missed the point.  Haynes is what he is at this point.  There is no "potential" to tap into.

I'm sorry you've mistaken me for someone who is a Panthers trasher.  I am definitely a Panthers realist.  I prefer to look at what is really happening; not what any rose colored glasses tell me, and certainly not what the negative masses tell me.

Haynes has shown us who he is.  He's on his second contract, one which the Panthers had no competition for his signature on.  Not even from the Washington Riverboats.  He has 1338 snaps in his career, making 83 tackles and 13 sacks.

By way of comparison, Mike Rucker was a good - not great - defensive end for us.  After five years of his career he had 244 tackles and 36.5 sacks.  Charles Johnson - good not great - 153 tackles and 31 sacks after five years.

Haynes is the dictionary definition of a JAG.  Doesn't mean he can't or won't contribute, just means he's an average NFL player.  Every team has them, every team needs them.  But you don't lay your hopes on a guy at this stage of their career suddenly becoming a solution.  He's just a rotational piece we employ because you can't have a roster full of studs.

Man, I'm sorry.  I didn't mean to insult you. That last bit is more for the constant trashers we have who's end argument is that there is nothing to look forward to with the Panthers.  I didn't mean that towards you!  Sadly I'm outside of the edit window, but again I have proved I am an idiot with a keyboard!

I don't disagree about the potential, I just happen to think he's a little more than a JAG, more of a role player.  To me, a JAG is someone with average NFL performance, and I just happen to think that Haynes gives us more than that as a situational pass rusher.

Edited by d-dave
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Car123 Mentor

Car123

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, BrianS said:

I'm sorry you missed the point.  Haynes is what he is at this point.  There is no "potential" to tap into.

I'm sorry you've mistaken me for someone who is a Panthers trasher.  I am definitely a Panthers realist.  I prefer to look at what is really happening; not what any rose colored glasses tell me, and certainly not what the negative masses tell me.

Haynes has shown us who he is.  He's on his second contract, one which the Panthers had no competition for his signature on.  Not even from the Washington Riverboats.  He has 1338 snaps in his career, making 83 tackles and 13 sacks.

By way of comparison, Mike Rucker was a good - not great - defensive end for us.  After five years of his career he had 244 tackles and 36.5 sacks.  Charles Johnson - good not great - 153 tackles and 31 sacks after five years.

Haynes is the dictionary definition of a JAG.  Doesn't mean he can't or won't contribute, just means he's an average NFL player.  Every team has them, every team needs them.  But you don't lay your hopes on a guy at this stage of their career suddenly becoming a solution.  He's just a rotational piece we employ because you can't have a roster full of studs.

Those DE were starters. Haynes is great depth like Al Wallace.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, BrianS said:

I'm sorry you missed the point.  Haynes is what he is at this point.  There is no "potential" to tap into.

I'm sorry you've mistaken me for someone who is a Panthers trasher.  I am definitely a Panthers realist.  I prefer to look at what is really happening; not what any rose colored glasses tell me, and certainly not what the negative masses tell me.

Haynes has shown us who he is.  He's on his second contract, one which the Panthers had no competition for his signature on.  Not even from the Washington Riverboats.  He has 1338 snaps in his career, making 83 tackles and 13 sacks.

By way of comparison, Mike Rucker was a good - not great - defensive end for us.  After five years of his career he had 244 tackles and 36.5 sacks.  Charles Johnson - good not great - 153 tackles and 31 sacks after five years.

Haynes is the dictionary definition of a JAG.  Doesn't mean he can't or won't contribute, just means he's an average NFL player.  Every team has them, every team needs them.  But you don't lay your hopes on a guy at this stage of their career suddenly becoming a solution.  He's just a rotational piece we employ because you can't have a roster full of studs.

He is a situational/depth guy. Kind of by definition a JAG because there are a lot of guys in the league that can fill his role.

Doesn't really mean I would want to cut him loose because everyone needs depth but I don't view him that much differently than someone like, say Obada. 

Although the Obada story was so cool that it did suck to see him go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
    • TD alt
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By TD alt · Posted

      He was also apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...