Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No one has a long Leash (including Reich)


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Sounds like Tepper is getting Impatient

per Adam Schefter on McAfee show just now.

 

https://x.com/patmcafeeshow/status/1721585377591341344?s=46

If Reich is fired after one season, no coach you would want to hire would come here without offering him ‘generational’ contract money.  Dan Snyder 2.0 but without hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Especially problematic statement...

"This is why David Tepper has been successful in business, because that's the way he operates."

That's fine in business. 

In football, not so much.

Football is an area where David Tepper doesn't have a clue, and if he thinks he can just operate a football team the same way he would a hedge fund, he's an idiot.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Presenting Nicole Tepper....

Heres her official bio.  There is literally nothing about her work history, education etc anywhere on the internet.  She looks like Jersey trash that got lucky and hooked up with a billionaire.   Thats 1/2 of who we have making football decisions.  That is a problem that is not going away

 

https://www.panthers.com/team/ownership_business/nicole-tepper

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good. He will throw his weight around and people will leak the crap he made them do and we can all finally see who did what in this mess.

All of those people have contracts so they are getting paid either way. He has no clue about how any of this works

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they do fire Fitt they should look at firing Reich and letting the new GM pick his HC.  Honestly the best thing moving forward would hiring a director like many have stated to run things, having a committee (ran by new director) find a new GM and letting the new GM find his HC.  I don't like pairing new GMs with old HCs and vise versa.  Build a roster and offense around Young and see how he does the next year or two.  If the new HC doesn't like what he see from Young after year 2 we will have our 1st rounder back to try again and let him pick his guy.  

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...