Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Calvin Throckmorton

GPantherfan

By GPantherfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Because we have nobody else. As bad as he is, I'll take him over Chandler Zavala any day.

Granted, but there were other choices.

One of the areas where I've started to question Frank Reich is depth chart decisions. I can't definitively say that there's somebody better than throckmorton on the roster right now, but I am wondering if he's not just getting to start because he's got a little more experience than some others..

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

One of the areas where I've started to question Frank Reich is depth chart decisions. I can't definitively say that there's somebody better than throckmorton on the roster right now, but I am wondering if he's not just getting to start because he's got a little more experience than some others..

So, Frank is Ron 2.0?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SetfreexX Mentor

SetfreexX

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, GPantherfan said:

So how does this guy stay on the field always? Teppers neighbors kids or something? WTH

IMG_1087.png

Zavala coming off the neck, and Mays hasn't been much better, I dunno why they didn't go after Norwell after he was released, can't be any worse than these guys we've trotted out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jay Roosevelt Grand Master

Jay Roosevelt

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Granted, but there were other choices.

One of the areas where I've started to question Frank Reich is depth chart decisions. I can't definitively say that there's somebody better than throckmorton on the roster right now, but I am wondering if he's not just getting to start because he's got a little more experience than some others..

I'm not sure we do. Cade Mays? A lateral move at best.

That said, there are surely better options we could sign off the street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I'm not sure we do. Cade Mays? A lateral move at best.

That said, there are surely better options we could sign off the street.

I'm not dead certain of that.

Granted, it gets more possible as the season goes on because they have to play fewer games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...