Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best and worst PFF grades


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Panthering said:

I'm so, so disappointed with Mingo so far.

I'm torn. I get he's a rookie and needs time, but then I think he was a reach where we took him and better players were available. I firmly believe this franchise out thinks the draft every year. Their drafts never align with the 4000 mocks out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/14/2023 at 2:10 PM, Htarnation4.0 said:

I'm torn. I get he's a rookie and needs time, but then I think he was a reach where we took him and better players were available. I firmly believe this franchise out thinks the draft every year. Their drafts never align with the 4000 mocks out there. 

Yeah there are two issues. 

It looks like odds of inconceivable length compounded exponentially, against Bryce Young HOF. Wherever you stand on that ceiling, is one thing.

Whether he can game manage like a point guard, that’s a little different question and apparently the last hope, for when the others are used up. 

I didn’t have any really, of the price being justified. I suppose they can tailor and cater and come up with some extremely hard to watch but mostly effective plans. Yes, even Reich when he gets off of this whatever it is, this experimental phase of shrunken boundary, PacMan looking, anti offense. I am out of ways to denigrate it, but it keeps on feeding me.

That brings me here: if you guys can be trusted, I have some crazy intel, and I have been very conflicted as to how much I should share. They are working hard to perfect an electronic template. I think remote viewing is an element. They are pretty tight lipped though. 

It’s kind of half Houdini half Tom Clancy. Like a passing submarine with GPS, so that you can really “launch” at the target (Russell Wilson is an advisor). 

Word from the inside is “holy poo!!!”. 

 

 

Okay, if I need to say this, here: Just kidding. There is no GPS (it’s more Loran I think). 

Edited by stratocatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...