Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For folks who will continue attending games this year, what are the reasons?

Dorian Gray

By Dorian Gray,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

grateflday Collaborator

grateflday

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, jasonluckydog said:

Could you imagine the excitement if we beat the Cowboys? All 50 to 60 Panther fans left storming the field like in college when the #1 team goes down. 

Lol What??  there’s going to be up to maybe 60 of us there on Sunday 🥳🥳 … was thinking my son and I would be the only two  🙂 

Edited by grateflday
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dorian Gray Proficient

Dorian Gray

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, grateflday said:

My son and I are still going because we just enjoy being at the stadium on game days.  We are going this Sunday with the attitude of being there to laugh at the spectacle it will be, be there for the sh*t show and yeah be at the stadium.  And hey.... maybe the Panthers will pull off a miracle 🤣

Always a good time bonding with your kids. My daughter isn't interested in football which, I have to say, is probably lucky for her. It's a tough slog sometimes lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dorian Gray Proficient

Dorian Gray

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

I went to 11 Bobcats games in 2011-12 when I lived close to the arena, because tickets were incredibly cheap and it was just a fun experience. We even won one of the games. But it requires the suspension of any expectation.

Haha I did the same! I had front row behind the basket for a game that year against the Raptors. From what I remember, they were pretty atrocious too and the arena was half-empty. Loved the leg room though.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Dorian Gray said:

Haha I did the same! I had front row behind the basket for a game that year against the Raptors. From what I remember, they were pretty atrocious too and the arena was half-empty. Loved the leg room though.

Oh man it was fun. We got tickets 4 rows from center court once for $12 each and saw Deron Williams bang 57 and barely win. The compulsive gamblers behind us had everyone in stitches too. Good times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...