Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has the "in game" experience started to take a step back with Tepper as well, talking about BOA?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes. I've been to several NFL stadiums and the BOA, while pretty, is way, way below the others. Like Nashville (Titans) is an uglier stadium but way more fun to be at.

Its the product of sterile old rich men in Richardson and Tepper who couldn't entertain a baby in a candy store

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, amcoolio said:

Yes. I've been to several NFL stadiums and the BOA, while pretty, is way, way below the others. Like Nashville (Titans) is an uglier stadium but way more fun to be at.

Its the product of sterile old rich men in Richardson and Tepper who couldn't entertain a baby in a candy store

I mean it’s also just like the crowd and vibe. 
 

you’re comparing it to a stadium that’s a ten minute walk from broadway. 
 

when you want your fam base coming straight from church, your “game day experience” is going to reflect that. 
 

tepper is way different from Richardson. Jerry was an old school rich southern racist. He cultivated what he thought an nfl game in the Carolinas should be. Tepper is just a bland corporatist. He’s going to hide behind a bunch of useless corpo speak and focus tested “solutions.” Panthers game are the nfl equivalent of panera. It’s what you get with a building full of managers terrified of upsetting the boss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a decline the last few years under JR, I think 2017 was when I noticed. Just seemed like they cheapened the entire process a smidge, some of the food options disappeared completely. I thought he was priming it to sale or just took his foot off the gas as the owner at his age. It really has been a nose dive on and off the field since then. I went for 1 game last year and none of it was worth more than $50 total. It felt like a shell of what it used to be. It made the wine and cheese crowd days seem like a step up and that's beyond sad.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been to sofi, soldier field, M&T, mile high, Atlanta before it was the anus, Green Bay, and the old meadowlands. In terms of fan experience I’d put BOA near the bottom of that list with M&T and lambeau at the top for fan experiences. It’s more on par with Atlanta during the non Vick years, aka it’s sucks. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...