Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scheme issues continue

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CanadianCat Veteran

CanadianCat

Posted
Posted

Im all for starting rookie QB's to get that learning curve out of the way and take advantage of the rookie wages.. but at this point we have to sit him the rest of the year. We cannot afford him to get hurt at the end of this season, impacting the start of next when we WILL have a new scheme and coaching staff.. 

I think this is officially a worse year then the 'Pickles' year.. and I watched ALL those games. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
Posted

You would think that they could try new wide receivers, adjust the play calls etc. there really is zero excuse for the results we have had. The Giants managed to win a game yesterday with an undrafted rookie QB and even he threw for three touchdowns. Hell, you could pull out a game like when we direct snapped to Deangelo Williams the entire fugging game against Atlanta back in the day when we had Chris Weinkie in who attempted less than 5 passes, if I’m not mistaken. There are ways to win football games dispite the team’s shortcomings, we just don’t have a coaching staff capable of pulling out a win no matter what the circumstances are, good or bad.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

You would think that they could try new wide receivers, adjust the play calls etc. there really is zero excuse for the results we have had. The Giants managed to win a game yesterday with an undrafted rookie QB and even he threw for three touchdowns. Hell, you could pull out a game like when we direct snapped to Deangelo Williams the entire fugging game against Atlanta back in the day when we had Chris Weinkie in who attempted less than 5 passes, if I’m not mistaken. There are ways to win football games dispite the team’s shortcomings, we just don’t have a coaching staff capable of pulling out a win no matter what the circumstances are, good or bad.  

Continuing to go pass heavy against Dallas definitely wasn't the answer.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
8 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

Makes sense what Greg is saying and what some have said all along.  I have concerns about Bryce that grow weekly but agree with him completely.

Bryce may not be the guy. It's also possible that even if he were the guy, what makes him the guy is going to get pounded out of him.

In this environment, it's hard to say.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted

The one thing you can say about Young is he can't stay in the traditional pocket and they need to give him space to have a chance. That isn't performance based but just an observation. He is swalloed up so fast I'm not even sure he can throw it away. Even with better blocking keeping the sacks off won't change that.

They have to try but there is not much to hope for there. Run another scheme further away from what he needs or keep doing more of the same while talking about changing personnel chasing that dream and avoiding the sad truth about his severe limitations. He doesn't have the wheels to Willson it away and create the space he needs to function.

They can't change anything because they already know it won't work any better and they also know they can't make what they want to work so it's full steam ahead waiting for the axe to fall. Plus Reich is the pivot point on coaching and his change record is the nail in their coffin for them all.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...