Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Al Wallace= Not a fan of Ickey


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Carolina Cajun said:

thats kinda my point, he needs to learn the position, get him some real world play time right now.  The Toth dude was listed as a Tackle, and Ricky Lee is a tackle.  Dont really care who it is, they can go and be just as bad as Icky is while icky gets 6 games to help prepare him to play guard next season.

Fair point but I don't think you are gonna see dudes fighting for their jobs make that move.

Not to mention, this staff is insanely slow to make offensive changes that are performance based.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Yeah he's a heavy-footed mauler and it's becoming clear he's not the athletic tackle we need in this zone blocking scheme.  In the right scheme he could maybe be a LT but he'd be wiping away his tears with hundred dollar bills as an All Pro LG.  It's not like those guys don't get paid.

The sad truth is, I really wonder if Christensen at Tackle and icky at guard would actually be a good combo.  If I remember correctly, Brady had some athleticism, his knock was the arm length (god what a dumb thing scouts fixate on).  I also seem to remember that Brady was never really a mauler so literally flipping them could be a good thing next season.  As I've said, Obviously that cant be the plan (gotta get someone this offseason for tackle), but I damn sure would open the competition and see if it could work.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

mike wahle on a 4MR discussion stated that the NFL has a year's tape on Ickey and now defensive coordinators and pass rushers know his tendencies and weaknesses. also, Ickey has always been a player that relied solely on his athleticism in order to dominate his opponents in the pasts. based on tapes from this year and last season, Ickey looked like he didn't do much technique and footwork training in the offseason which leads him to were we are now.

combined with the fact reich's blocking schemes doesn't fit to his strengths

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

The sad truth is, I really wonder if Christensen at Tackle and icky at guard would actually be a good combo.  If I remember correctly, Brady had some athleticism, his knock was the arm length (god what a dumb thing scouts fixate on).  I also seem to remember that Brady was never really a mauler so literally flipping them could be a good thing next season.  As I've said, Obviously that cant be the plan (gotta get someone this offseason for tackle), but I damn sure would open the competition and see if it could work.

This.  Been arguing that they should flip positions, which plays to both their strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

The sad truth is, I really wonder if Christensen at Tackle and icky at guard would actually be a good combo.  If I remember correctly, Brady had some athleticism, his knock was the arm length (god what a dumb thing scouts fixate on).  I also seem to remember that Brady was never really a mauler so literally flipping them could be a good thing next season.  As I've said, Obviously that cant be the plan (gotta get someone this offseason for tackle), but I damn sure would open the competition and see if it could work.

I'll take great feet over great arm length all day everyday. Ideal arm length is more of a want than a need IMO. If you don't have the feet to stay in front of them you're beat no matter what.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thennek said:

Hurney also typically did not trade away draft picks…

Eh

short memory I’m guessing?

forget trading away pick to move up for Greg Little.  Or trading away what was the 33rd overall pick for Armanti Edwards

or maybe trading away a future 1st for Everett Brown.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncfan said:

Eh

short memory I’m guessing?

forget trading away pick to move up for Greg Little.  Or trading away what was the 33rd overall pick for Armanti Edwards

or maybe trading away a future 1st for Everett Brown.

LOL- I stand corrected.

i was adding up all the draft picks squandered the past 3-years and it hurts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't rag on Ekwonu too much because I think the potential is still there. He would probably be a Pro Bowl G though. 

So basically we took (in order):

Bryce over CJ ...Fitt

Ekwonu over Cross...Fitt

Jaycee over Surtain..Fitt

.... what we got right: 

Brown over Kinlaw (came close to bust status around here his first two seasons) ...Hurney under Tepp

Burns over Sweat...Hurney under Tepp

DJ over Ridley (100% the right pick)...Hurney

CMC over Henry (about the same)..Hurney

One GM hit on every pick and not just the first but the second as well (in large part and excluding Little). One man is still looking to claim he grand slammed his first. The closest being Horn, who is extremely talented yet never available. 

Common factor: Fitts has to go. Combine all his FA acquisitions + the draft and his hit rate is so low it should be alarming. Reich isn't the only one with a chair "on fire". 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Yeah he's a heavy-footed mauler and it's becoming clear he's not the athletic tackle we need in this zone blocking scheme.  In the right scheme he could maybe be a LT but he'd be wiping away his tears with hundred dollar bills as an All Pro LG.  It's not like those guys don't get paid.

It's not his athleticism it's his God awful fundamentals....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Almost may as well keep Dalton. Geno won’t be competition. IMO.  He could be but I don’t think they will take that approach. I think more Andy pt 2, big bro, mentor, emergency starter.  I really want to be wrong but we have had no encouraging signs there for two years.    If we are stuck with Bryce again, and it looks like we will be, I would so much more prefer a younger player with a possible future. A guy that hasn’t been great but maybe didn’t have the best situation - and let nature take its course. But I don’t expect anything that I want to happen, as far as it goes. It never does. Not one time yet under Tepper. Starting with the 3-4. 
    • We can go on and on about the players, but I'm more into judging Canales O based on the playcalling and general design. It's still a very mixed bag for me. There are times where I like what I see. The rolling pockets he'll call at times seem to play right into Bryce's best qualities which I like. Him using Jimmy Horn with certain plays is good - although execution by Horn has been frustrating when he missed an opportunity for a big play. if it's 4th down and a pass play, I like the odds of a good play. Giving Coker more snaps over XL recently is a potentially good sign that he's not satisfied with XL's mistakes and is adjusting accordingly. I don't follow why we don't use the tight ends more often in the pass game, but seems that those work better than average. At some point, we were really running the ball well, so that's something, I suppose. On the other hand, while he has shown to adjust, it often is too much of a swing in the other direction. Too often, we do something and it's working - like if running to the perimeter is getting us yards - only for Canales to then go back go stuffing up in the middle and wasting a down. Don't need to harp about the times when he tries to be too cute and it blows up in our faces. Canales has too many bad tendencies that our opponents are picking up on, like how we are quite likely to run on first down. Finally, I sometimes get the impression his play designs are for players that we don't actually have. We just don't really have explosive players on our teams that can make guys miss, and so these route concepts really should reflect the reality that YAC is not really expected and so it needs to be more vertical and/or have elements that help create separation by design. In other words, it still feels like the margin of error for a successful play, even a basic one, is too narrow.
    • Sure want him to play if possible!!!!
×
×
  • Create New...