Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Mock Drafts


pantherj
 Share

Recommended Posts

Trade down to acquire more picks and In this scenario we tag and trade Burns to Minnesota for the 42nd pick and guess who was there in this draft? Cooper Beebe. Dude, Powers and Cooper could help rebuild the oline quickly. Sweat and Robinson are pieces for the 3-4.Screenshot_20240131-142032.thumb.png.75ec2e4fa3f103ed3734a75eef4b2fe5.png

Edited by mickeye76
Just adding some thoughts.
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is becoming a good boredom killer

this seems more likely, with no trades. not as many weapons on offense as normal, but coming around to that last pick and still seeing a mccaffrey out there seems like a safer bet than a flyer on another OL or DL player

ja'tavion sanders keeps ending up in my lap, not mad about it

Screenshot_20240202_134550_Chrome.png

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully Penix or Nix are there at 33. Not for us, but a team like the Giants would trade up for them and give us their two 2nd round picks for it.

I maintain that we take a lineman, offensive or defensive, in the 2nd round. Preferably a center, Bozeman really fell off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, amcoolio said:

Hopefully Penix or Nix are there at 33. Not for us, but a team like the Giants would trade up for them and give us their two 2nd round picks for it.

I maintain that we take a lineman, offensive or defensive, in the 2nd round. Preferably a center, Bozeman really fell off.

Yup, this is where I'm at for now.  The best players left at #33 are QBs when I do my mock drafts nearly every time.  I know we aren't taking one, as we should, so might as well take advantage of it.  Move back and get some more draft capital.  No further back than the early 40's, so not beyond 10 picks.  In most years #33 isn't bad, but it's no man's land this year as far as I'm concerned.  If we stay, I have a feeling we will reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...