Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Miss Sam Darnold


bythenbrs
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, AggieLean said:

Letting go of Sam was the right play. You just have to hit in the draft with the QB pick. We did not, but the play to move up to 1 was not terrible. You had a generational QB there 

The play to move up was 100% correct, but Tepper double downed on 21, just to show everyone that analytics said it was the right play. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bythenbrs said:

With all his MANY weaknesses, he did not have a noodle arm, his footwork was better than Bryce, and we could actually win games if we went run heavy and schemed to hide his limitations.  Winning football games; does anyone remember what that was like just 12 months ago?

Come back, Sam.  All’s forgiven.

I don't want that  back 

 

No other QB sees ghost but pass to them. It's about passing to playmakers, not to ghostbusters. And having a cannon like arm to pasa to them doesn't change that fact! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, falconlynx said:

Y’all all got what you wanted. Now you can live with it. 

Nah.

The move to go up to #1 was not wrong. Picking Bryce was, as well as going with Frank. Picking Bryce was the worst move we could’ve made. There was a generational QB there, and 2 other QBs who’d had us in a much better spot.

Edited by AggieLean
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Bryce Young will never be as good as Sam Darnold.  

That's not a compliment for Darnold.

Obviously you are a hater by making such an outrageous comment. If you don't like my Bryce, fine but don't you EVER make false absolute comments like that again if you know anything about winning. If our GM didn't trade away our ONLY playmaker with breakaway speed, we would be winning games now or did you missed how DJ laterally won that game for da Bears last week on their last drive when they were down. It was a sight to behold!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GhostWhispah said:

Obviously you are a hater by making such an outrageous comment. If you don't like my Bryce, fine but don't you EVER make false absolute comments like that again if you know anything about winning. If our GM didn't trade away our ONLY playmaker with breakaway speed, we would be winning games now or did you missed how DJ laterally won that game for da Bears last week on their last drive when they were down. It was a sight to behold!

 

 

Don't take it personally, Bryce.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

Nah.

The move to go up to #1 was not wrong. Picking Bryce was, as well as going with Frank. Picking Bryce was the worst move we could’ve made. There was a generational QB there, and 2 other QBs who’d had us in a much better spot.

WRONG!!!! Bryce was the RIGHT choice but trading our ONLY playmaker plus 2 1st round picks to move up in the draft to draft anyone was wrong which i mentioned when the trade went down. So the sooner you realized this, the better off you be to understanding right from wrong instead of hate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Necas is going to be stud with a team like leafs that lets their stars shine. I’m going to miss that guy. 
    • ast updated today 19th May 2024 Some people are unsure if Sugar Defender  is real, so here's the truth: there's no evidence that it's a scam. The company clearly lists all the ingredients and doesn't make wild promises. Instead, they support their claims with scientific studies. They have research backing up what they say about Sugar Defender's benefits. Even if some people are skeptical, there's no proof that Sugar Defender is fake. It's important to look at the facts and see that the company is being honest and open about their product.         Order Now Sugar Defender and Get 85% Off   The best part about this supplement is that it's really easy to use, and you don't need to do anything extra to keep your blood sugar levels steady. Plus, it's all-natural and made safely to address the main cause of blood sugar problems.   How long does it take for Sugar Defender to work? How fast Sugar Defender works can be different for each person. It depends on things like how fast your body works, any health issues you already have, and how often you use it. But since they give you 60 days to try it out and get your money back if it doesn't work for you, it's likely that most people see some changes within that time if they use it like they're supposed to. For the best results, use it for at least 90 days.   What Is Sugar Defender? Sugar Defender is a special formula that helps your body respond better to insulin. It's made with the purest ingredients. Every ingredient has been tested many times to make sure they're the best, and the company says there are no stimulants, chemicals, or things that could cause allergies in it. They make it in a super clean lab that follows strict rules. The goal of Sugar Defender is to naturally lower your blood sugar levels and keep them steady and healthy. It's a supplement that won't get you hooked and doesn't have any stimulants or GMOs. And guess what? It's easy to use! Each bottle has enough for a whole month. Just take the right amount every day, and you're all set!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    • Agree on Necas, he’s gone. Guentzel seems 50-50 to me, Canes would have to pony up. Still not sure Skjei will be back. From exit interviews he seemed less optimistic than Pesce and I definitely don’t think Pesce is back. Jarvis and Noesen have to be back. I think if Kuzy shoots more he could be a great asset. Put him with a passer like Turbo and a net front like Noesen.
×
×
  • Create New...