Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“Tepper inquired about what it would take to trade for Belichick following the 2023 season."


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Im still alittle shocked that Bill gets fired, I have to see it.....I could not fire the man who got 6 SBs. Kaft signed him to a contract extension this past year too.

 

Plus no way Bill wants his new team to trade a 1st+_____ for his services. Hes smarter than that.....

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

Im still alittle shocked that Bill gets fired, I have to see it.....I could not fire the man who got 6 SBs. Kaft signed him to a contract extension this past year too.

 

Plus no way Bill wants his new team to trade a 1st+_____ for his services. Hes smarter than that.....

 

Belicheck is the greatest coach of all-time (8 Super Bowl rings), he’s not getting fired.  

He’s gonna be forced to “retire” and the craziest highest bidder will likely be in-play (ahem).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Belicheck is the greatest coach of all-time (8 Super Bowl rings), he’s not getting fired.  

He’s gonna be forced to “retire” and the craziest highest bidder will likely be in-play (ahem).

I thought for sure Kaft would have allow Bill to get the all-time wins record and nicely ask him to step down/retire.

 

Plus the amount of hate about Bill without brady. In those 18 years Bill nearly always had a top 8 defense. In like 4 different seasons he had the #1 overall unit. Many times other teams basic their game plans off how Bill attacked the team they are facing. Hes still the best defensive mind in the league, bar none.

 

Plus everyone talking Brady being the main reason, they forget how times Adam "HOFer" Vinatieri won them games too. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Excellent math.  The point is this--he would not be a legendary coach without Brady--and he had Drew Bledsoe before him.  How many coaches have a 45% win ratio?  A lot of them.

Ron Rivera

Matt Rhule

Frank Reich

You’re debating Bill Belichick’s winning percentage over that group? 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...