Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breaking, Ian Rapoport: Fitterer Fired


NJPanthers12
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, razorwolf said:

IMO I would hire #BrandtTilis from

to become Team President or VP-Football Administration! Making #KristiColeman either CFO or VP-Football Adminstration; Let

go; and leave #JeffBrown as VP-Football Operations!

If you're gonna steal somebody from the Chiefs, it should be Mike Borgonzi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, razorwolf said:

IMO I would hire #BrandtTilis from

to become Team President or VP-Football Administration! Making #KristiColeman either CFO or VP-Football Adminstration; Let

go; and leave #JeffBrown as VP-Football Operations!

Suleiman is our cap guy, correct?  Our cap space is the one of the ONLY bright spots on this team.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Suleiman is our cap guy, correct?  Our cap space is the one of the ONLY bright spots on this team.

It really isn’t. We’ve paid out way too much for mediocre results. Our 2024 cap according to Spotrac is $40M and that doesn’t include Burns and a full roster. If we tag Burns and say sign Higgins, we are done unless we start eating into 2025. Bumping up against the cap in 2023 and 2024 is sad when you have a rookie QB contract and you win 2-5 games per year. Remember at the beginning of the 2023 offseason when our 2024 cap was lauded for have over $100M in cap (like 2025 now)? Well, that’s because we didn’t even have a full team and now we are one tag and one WR FA signing away from having to restructure deals for a 2-15 team.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WhoKnows said:

It really isn’t. We’ve paid out way too much for mediocre results. Our 2024 cap according to Spotrac is $40M and that doesn’t include Burns and a full roster. If we tag Burns and say sign Higgins, we are done unless we start eating into 2025. Bumping up against the cap in 2023 and 2024 is sad when you have a rookie QB contract and you win 2-5 games per year. Remember at the beginning of the 2023 offseason when our 2024 cap was lauded for have over $100M in cap (like 2025 now)? Well, that’s because we didn’t even have a full team and now we are one tag and one WR FA signing away from having to restructure deals for a 2-15 team.

That's on the GM mainly.  The GM acquires the players and the cap guy has to make the numbers work.

The next 3 years, in order, we are 13th, 8th and 1st in cap room as it stands today.  Not bad at all.  Obviously you don't remember the Hurney days when we were always at the bottom in cap space with crazy generous contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

That's on the GM mainly.  The GM acquires the players and the cap guy has to make the numbers work.

The next 3 years, in order, we are 13th, 8th and 1st in cap room as it stands today.  Not bad at all.  Obviously you don't remember the Hurney days when we were always at the bottom in cap space with crazy generous contracts.

Our numbers look good with rookie QB contract and let’s be honest, the worst roster in the NFL. Our top 11 (stretched to 11 because of who 11 is) cap hits right now in 2024 are Moron, Donte, Brown, Bell, Corbett, Hurst, Thielen, Young, Tuttle, Woods and Sanders. When that’s your top 11, you shouldn’t be 13th in cap space, you should be 1st.

Also, LOL at us being 1st in 2026. We have Young, Sanders, Mingo, DJ Johnson, Zavala and Robinson under contract. We literally have 6 guys under contract in 2026 and I wouldn’t be shocked if none of them are starters and half of them aren’t even on the team. Easy to be #1 in cap space in 2026 when you literally don’t have a real starter signed past 2025.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Our numbers look good with rookie QB contract and let’s be honest, the worst roster in the NFL. Our top 11 (stretched to 11 because of who 11 is) cap hits right now in 2024 are Moron, Donte, Brown, Bell, Corbett, Hurst, Thielen, Young, Tuttle, Woods and Sanders. When that’s your top 11, you shouldn’t be 13th in cap space, you should be 1st.

Also, LOL at us being 1st in 2026. We have Young, Sanders, Mingo, DJ Johnson, Zavala and Robinson under contract. We literally have 6 guys under contract in 2026 and I wouldn’t be shocked if none of them are starters and half of them aren’t even on the team. Easy to be #1 in cap space in 2026 when you literally don’t have a real starter signed past 2025.

You don't understand how this works and it shows.  NO TEAM has a full roster signed next year at this point, or the year after or the year after that.  Yes, we have dead money on the books, but so DOES EVERY OTHER TEAM. The 2024 roster is what it is at the top and again, other teams have under-performing players on the books too. 

Let me spell this out to you, good teams are generally cap poor because they have top players to pay.  Should be we higher? Somewhat, but just because we are a 2 win team doesn't mean we should have the top cap space either.  it's not a direct correlation.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...