Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just how bad was Bryce Young?


TN05
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

This is the one that always actually got me..

image.thumb.jpeg.935f38a27a9712bdf6ebbe4959a4c58b.jpeg

And Burns isn’t exactly what you would call big for a D lineman 

He always mogged in every one!!

 

Is there any pictures that Byce is the tallest male in them??(the ones with tepper dont count)

Can anyone find a couple??

 

 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frankw said:

We will hear about coaching the OL and the receivers but even the biggest Panthers homers should have a difficult time sugar coating all this.

At best it's on par with Clausen.

Quite depressing.

Clausen threw three times as many interceptions as he did touchdowns. Pump the goddamn brakes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Next let’s do 

just how bad was the o-line

just how bad were the receivers

just how bad was the coaching

just how bad was the play calling

You could copy/paste this post from any comment about Sam Darnold three years ago.

But go off.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have ZERO problem if they walked away from Bryce. They won't of course. But I'm so confident he won't be elite that I have no issues with him giving it a go elsewhere. It'd be interesting to read what the Bryce Guys say in that respect. Are they so sure Bryce is going to be the next great QB in the NFL we simply have to give him more chances? Are they scared to see him go someplace else and make us regret it?

We are not getting an all-time elite Oline any time soon ... if ever. We are not drafting/signing the best WR corps any time soon. Our next coach can't be elite because the elite coaches already have a job. If Young can't even show one shred of elite gameplay in 16 games, what makes you think he will turn it around next season? Even if he gets somewhat better, he'll just be on Baker Mayfield's level. It's a shame we can't cut bait. 2024 will be another wasted season.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

The receivers were excellent three years ago. The offensive line was passable. The coaching was trash. 

Doesn’t seem the same. 

I'm talking about before we traded for him.

It is almost verbatim the same rhetoric about his time with the Jets.

If it doesn't seem the same it's because you don't want to see it.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really is pointless for all of us to debate this any longer. We will not magically get an elite WR corps. It'll take spot on drafting, trades, and FA signings ... not to mention we also need to do the same with the OLine. We also need to hire THE man at HC and an OC who can put in a great scheme for Bryce. All by 2025 at the LATEST. In other words, it ain't happening ... and the Bryce Guys will always have an excuse. Always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mc52beast said:

Next let’s do 

just how bad was the o-line

just how bad were the receivers

just how bad was the coaching

just how bad was the play calling

Yes, they all sucked just like Bryce. Sucking is not zero-sum, and there was limitless suck to go around this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Thats understandable...but regardless of what happens in the off season Bryce still needs to show some type of improvement next year. We cannot look at evaluations of the draft and FA and make self-determinations that what was done isnt good enough for bryce to succeed. BRYCE STILL NEEDS TO SHOW some type of GROWTH from last season. This cannot become a carousel every year of the roster not being good enough for him.

If Bryce looks like the same player with a better coaching hire and better offensive cast then I will be leading that charge. I think he will be improved. Will it be 4k passing 30 Tds improved? Not likely but a serviceable game manager is what I hope it at the very least it looks like next year. It won't be worth what we traded up for but it'd be a start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...