Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interview requests


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Slowick.

I heard him called a non-stoner Mike McDonald. Brilliant mind and very personable. I’m very intrigued. What he did to the Browns defense was impressive. 
 

That said, I don’t understand the lack of interest in Harbaugh, other than Tepper being an idiot. 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

I heard him called a non-stoner Mike McDonald. Brilliant mind and very personable. I’m very intrigued. What he did to the Browns defense was impressive. 
 

That said, I don’t understand the lack of interest in Harbaugh, other than Tepper being an idiot. 

 

 

Likely the other way around. Why would a candidate with all options be interested in Carolina?

We are stuck with the bottom tier

Edited by csx
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, csx said:

Likely the other way around. Why would a candidate with all options be interested in Carolina?

We are stuck with the bottom tier

Out of our candidate pool, there are really good options, and some obvious stinkers.. but I like what we’re looking at this year compared to last year tbh

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thunderraiden said:

So were done with initial interviews for GM and HC, should start hearing rumbling soon.

Yeah unless there’s a surprise interview over the weekend we’ve likely wrapped up HC initial interviews. Gotta get to the inpersons in earnest, everyone is gonna be moving quick. Need to nail down your top dog and contingencies. 
 

GM is a whole different animal, haven’t heard anything in like a week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

I certainly hope not 

Who else have we not interviewed? Everyone that they said they would interview has interviewed. Unless you think we will add a name on Sat/Sun? Who would that be? Its clear Belichick, Harbaugh, and Vrabel have no interest in coming here or else we would have interviewed them already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Steelo said:

Out of our candidate pool, there are really good options, and some obvious stinkers.. but I like what we’re looking at this year compared to last year tbh

I probably used wrong words. But guys like Bill and Jim can do whatever they want or just retire. I'm certain they let out who they will interview for and it should be no surprise we wouldn't be on that list.

Being the worst franchise has consequences. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. But you do understand that there is no such thing as not signing free agents, right? That's what I mean. So make some good free agency moves and do well in the draft. That's step one. If you can't accomplish that, then this will just keep getting worse.
    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
×
×
  • Create New...