Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rich Eisen's top 10 HC candidates


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

Where is the Raheem Morris love coming from all of a sudden? The guy wasn’t great in Tampa. What makes him worth recycling after a decade + of being an assistant. Just wondering what got him so trendy. 

People aren't holding a coaching job a decade against him, rightfully so.  Years working under McVay you gotta figure he's learned and grown.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Steelo said:

I don't think so, he's just not at the top of my list.  I would hire him before a couple other names on the list. 

If they end up with Morris - the team is in worse shape than any of us can imagine. 
 

Morris, Quinn, these retread coaches need to GTFO. 

Edited by 4Corners
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Raheem Morris would be a TERRIBLE hire 

bro, disagree with this. Hes familiar with NFC south and been practicing against one of the better offense minds for years. Hes a good age after being the NFL youngest HC. Hes coached both sides of the ball at high levels. 

Hes not my first choice, but I wouldnt be upset if tepper went off his current path and surprised named him HC. 

If you look at what hes done at LA, theres not much there after you take away darnold. Still puts on a stiff defense. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those far too busy or just too damn lazy to watch a 12 minute video, here's your list. Watch the video for an explanation or just think you know everything there is to know about them I don't care.

10) Ejiro Evero

9) Frank Smith

8 ) Bobby Slowik

7) Antonio Pierce

6) Ben Johnson

5) David Shaw (former Stanford HC)

4) Raheem Morris

3) Mike Vrabel

2) Jim Harbaugh

1) Bill Belichik

Again, watch the video for getting an idea of where he's coming from. Or don't.

It's just an interesting perspective from a guy whose opinion I always thought was interesting. Not sure about Ben Johnson being so low or David Shaw being on it at all, but i appreciate having my thoughts scrambled a bit.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

It's just an interesting perspective from a guy whose opinion I always thought was interesting. Not sure about Ben Johnson being so low or David Shaw being on it at all, but i appreciate having my thoughts scrambled a bit.

Yeah super weird seeing him mentioned seeing as there's no traction for him at any opening..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd rather not have Burns and draft good edge rushers. He wasn't worth the contract he got for a dude that could only rush the passer and frankly did a terrible job of it for us because whenever he did beat his blocker, he would whiff on the QB. Congrats to him for actually being able to wrap up the QB this year - it's the first time he has consistently been able to do it. The amount of teams that ran right at him while he was with us shows that teams realized he was an undersized edge and could get pushed backwards several yards on run plays. Having Dexter Lawrence next to you helps mask that problem
    • I mean, some of y'all keep on saying that, but the fact is is that he is the only Giant feasting. Burns is just better than many of us thought, myself included. Sometimes it just takes guys time to get to the top of their game, that's why I'm going to give our rookies a lot of grace. It might be a couple of years before they hit their stride (though it didn't take Burns that long). But I have been disappointed. Moreover, I suspect that they all might benefit by migrating to  a 4-3 base.  But Burns is what he is. It was ultimately bad timing IMO. After Scott Fitterer failed to take the two firsts, things were destined to go downhill. I think we should've kept Clowney for another year or so more than Burns, but it's all been fûcked up anyway, so nobody was probably going to make that much of a difference.
×
×
  • Create New...