Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Sando ranks the head coaching opportunities


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

...and yeah, we come in last.

Here's the writeup on the Panthers, with a new little piece of info about one of Tepper's practices.

8. Carolina Panthers

The next coach in Carolina must manage an impulsive owner while also creating a successful offense around an outlier quarterback whose confidence could need rebuilding after a brutal rookie season. Working within a weaker division should help, but this job comes with flashing red warning lights.

People who have worked for Panthers owner David Tepper tend to like him. They know he cares about winning. They also have suffered from his overly impulsive decision-making and his intrusion in their areas of expertise.

They question whether Tepper’s methods work as well in the NFL as they might in the investing world that Tepper dominated as a hedge-fund manager. For example, coaches who have worked in Carolina say Tepper’s fact-finding missions in the building, which include asking members of the offensive staff about their defensive counterparts, and vice versa, can amplify divisions.

Tepper signed Frank Reich and a staff featuring big names to long-term contracts amid much fanfare last offseason. Reich lasted 11 games. By then, he had relinquished and taken back play-calling duties, operating like a coach under great pressure from above. The next coach should expect similar treatment until Tepper demonstrates otherwise.

...

Yikes! 😬

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of what we found most concerning from the "Hunger Games" story was the question of why Tepper would listen to coaches backstabbing their colleagues rather than squashing that sort of internal toxicity.

Turns out he was actually encouraging it 😖

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 5
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No wonder his staff keep eating themselves...

Yeah no good chance in Carolina until Tepper removes himself from the daily stuff. He also loves doing all of the stuff that made his team the worst in the league. It's time to pack up hope and put it somewhere dark and dry because it's not useful here anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

For example, coaches who have worked in Carolina say Tepper’s fact-finding missions in the building, which include asking members of the offensive staff about their defensive counterparts, and vice versa, can amplify divisions.

This sounds like part of the culture used by successful hedge funds.

Example from Business Insider:

Quote

Many employees fear criticizing their peers and managers to their face — but at Bridgewater Associates, the world's largest hedge fund, you could get fired if you don't.

Bridgewater, run by the billionaire Ray Dalio, has a well-documented culture of "radical transparency," where employees routinely judge one another's performance. The corporate culture isn't for the faint of heart — Dalio says about 30% of new employees leave the firm within 18 months.

I'm not saying it's right or wrong for a football team; coaches (at least the ones I've talked with) tend to be macho types that are used to giving and receiving harsh criticism.

Edited by Evil Hurney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

I'm not saying it's right or wrong for a football team; coaches (at least the ones I've talked with) tend to be macho types that are used to giving and receiving harsh criticism.

Oh, I absolutely think it's wrong for a football team.

Harsh criticism is fine, but say it to my face, not behind my back to the owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yeah, a lot of this boils down to the common story of what happens when good guys go to work for a--holes...

Frank Reich and Scott Fitterer were both considered pretty solid people, but they went to work for a boss who seemed to think JR Ewing was a role model.

If you're the good guy in that situation, you have two choices: keep trying to be the best person you can amid the chaos or just give in and become the bad guy.

Reich took the former path, while Fitterer apparently turned to The Dark Side (or at least took some advice from it). That path hardly ever works because the natural bad guys will always be better at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Part of what we found most concerning from the "Hunger Games" story was the question of why Tepper would listen to coaches backstabbing their colleagues rather than squashing that sort of internal toxicity.

Turns out he was actually encouraging it 😖

As long as he is involved with anything, we are doomed.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Reich took the former path, while Fitterer apparently turned to The Dark Side (or at least took some advice from it). That path hardly ever works because the natural bad guys will always be better at it.

It really doesn't matter what Fitterer did. If he wasn't terrible at his job, he'd still be GM.

Reich, maybe you can argue that his lack of success was ownership related.

Fitterer appears to just suck.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're the no man's land of the league (perhaps on and off the field). We're in a vertex, to the point of throwing poo up against a wall and seeing what sticks, while spinning around at 200 mph. 

Can dumb luck even save us now? It looks like that might be what it takes due to the pure inTeptitude.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

...and yeah, we come in last.

Here's the writeup on the Panthers, with a new little piece of info about one of Tepper's practices.

8. Carolina Panthers

The next coach in Carolina must manage an impulsive owner while also creating a successful offense around an outlier quarterback whose confidence could need rebuilding after a brutal rookie season. Working within a weaker division should help, but this job comes with flashing red warning lights.

People who have worked for Panthers owner David Tepper tend to like him. They know he cares about winning. They also have suffered from his overly impulsive decision-making and his intrusion in their areas of expertise.

They question whether Tepper’s methods work as well in the NFL as they might in the investing world that Tepper dominated as a hedge-fund manager. For example, coaches who have worked in Carolina say Tepper’s fact-finding missions in the building, which include asking members of the offensive staff about their defensive counterparts, and vice versa, can amplify divisions.

Tepper signed Frank Reich and a staff featuring big names to long-term contracts amid much fanfare last offseason. Reich lasted 11 games. By then, he had relinquished and taken back play-calling duties, operating like a coach under great pressure from above. The next coach should expect similar treatment until Tepper demonstrates otherwise.

...

Yikes! 😬

Not a Tepper sympathizer at all, but if a coach demonstrated they knew what they were doing and you could see some progress, he’d probably back off a little. A huge issue is we looked so inept under Reich. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tarheel119 said:

Not a Tepper sympathizer at all, but if a coach demonstrated they knew what they were doing and you could see some progress, he’d probably back off a little. A huge issue is we looked so inept under Reich. 

I understand, but the buck stops with Tepper. I give him no pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...