Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

who all from the previous coaching staff has been fired?


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just got to thinking about this. since Tepper spent a beaucoup of money for that staff i'd think his desire would be to keep as many around so the money isn't wasted. 

probably most of us would prefer we get rid of most of them, but there has to be some good hires in there that just received poor guidance. maybe it would help out the incoming HC to not have to start from scratch getting his staff.

who would you feel ok or good about keeping around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one should have stayed. Tepper is willing to piss away HC money every year but he wants to keep the not so all star staff to save dough? I though that was his one positive, the ability to keep throwing cash around endlessly?

After 2023 none should still be here for many reasons. First off it was a poorly built staff anyways, in reality it was just an expensive waste of a try. Matching a HC to that staff like Wilks had in Arizona I am guessing will have much of the same outcome. Hire a HC and let him pick his staff, not the other way around. More staff infighting nect year would be another layer of dysfunction to add to the heap.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

I mean at this point I'd be surprised if it wasn't Canales, as much as I wanted MacDonald. 
 

With Canales its pretty obvious we would keep defense intact, he would probably keep Tabor too.

i wouldn't have a problem with keeping the D intact as much as possible and Tabor as well. Let Canales do what he wants with the O. i can't see canales having a problem with the D staff staying intact as long as there is no discord with or within the D staff. for them it would probably be good not to have to pick up and try to find another job and move their families and they probably wouldn't find that kind of pay anywhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

who would you feel ok or good about keeping around?

Sir Purr. That's about it. 

new HC should be able to hire his own staff.  Build a culture and environment.  A new HC shouldn't be given a staff from a prior failed era for the billionaire owner to save a couple bucks. 

we just heard about the GOT nature of this org during this last era.  In no way should a new HC be saddled with a bunch of dudes he doesn't want from it.   That going to keep smart HC away.

clean slate.  We already aren't doing it with Morgan and that section.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you think the NFL or NBA are worried about lawsuits or something like officiating scandals bringing down their empires, I think you're giving them way too much credit.  Go watch the documentary on Tim Donaghy in the NBA and who was involved and what he did.  One of the guys he worked with is still one of the league's top trusted officials, especially for playoff games.  IIRC, they have records showing he was the person Donaghy exchanged phone calls with the most during his time fixing games.  And his reputation is beyond horrible...  but he's untouchable.  I also encourage you to go watch DeMaurice Smith's Breakfast Club interview.  He laid out how for fans, we just know these organizations as a singular, public entity - like THE Carolina Panthers, or THE Dallas Cowboys- but, in actuality, he said that is the public-facing identity of an umbrella company comprised of countless smaller businesses and LLCs.  He is tasked with trying to audit their books, and he said these organizations are structured in such a way that even HE can't ever know what they truly make in a year.  It's impossible.  And now, this is just me speculating on top of that, but you think the league's themselves are structured similarly?  They are untouchable.  IIRC, they are recognized legally as "entertainment" organizations, thus protecting themselves in cases where integrity would come into question.  They are protected, layer, behind layer, behind layer.  Betting works because there is some degree of control that ensures the house wins more than it loses, by a lot.  The short of it is, "Give them bread and circuses" and all that jazz.  These leagues operate with total impunity.  Again, it's not just because I'm a Panthers fan, but even if I wasn't and I watched Superbowl 50 without a dog in the fight I would walk away feeling like that outcome was controlled and influenced HEAVILY to where the Panthers were not given a level playing field.  The same poo happens every Sunday to teams playing those blue blood franchises and ones with intriguing storylines. 
    • This Chuba isn't getting traded, but Rico very well could be in a few weeks if he keeps playing well in a tandem backfield with Chuba also playing well. I think we'd end up going with a two headed monster in that case, but with Rico being on a one year deal, it does open up the possibility of a contending team offering up a decent pick for him.  Depending on the recovery of Hampton, I could see someone like the Chargers giving us a 4th for him if they think he could put them over the top, he would fit nicely in a Harbaugh system I think. If it comes to that, we need to make that trade, as I can't see any way we re-sign Rico with all our other needs and getting Brooks back too.  And he's not going to get a contract big enough to get us any comp picks in return, especially if/when we sign a FA or two ourselves.  So if we're not going to bring him back, the prudent decision would really be to get a draft pick for him at the deadline.
    • It's all about what they do at QB. It's clear the rest of the roster is improving. If they commit long term to Young because he's being carried to wins then we're fuged. I think that's a separate issue to finally being competitive again.  There's no QB in this Draft that's going to ride in on his white horse on day one and save us, so we absolutely shouldn't be playing for Draft position. 
×
×
  • Create New...