Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Higgins to Panthers possible?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Pretty much. Nailed it with that last paragraph.

We need a natural separater that comes with refined route running skills and a program with pro style offense.

Regarding the draft—mentioned elsewhere but the few that have had my eye (primarily since they were on a lot of national tv during the season) were McMillan out of WAS and Mitchell in Texas.

Mitchell at 33 is a strong possibility. His stock is rising - diverse route tree, can play multiple spots, good route runner, strong burst off the line.

I was a huge Odunze fan going into the year but he cemented a solid 1st round status. Troy Franklin is another to keep an eye on but he’s not as refined as a route runner, but has awesome big play ability. 

I think Mitchell would be ideal but I did not think he'd be there.  I think so much elite talent at the top will push productive talent down a round.  I think we will need to draft a WR early in the second and fourth, (at least that is what I do in my mocking, and we all know if I do it in mocks, that is what should be done!) 

I believe a projected first rounder will be there at 33.  I just hope it is someone with a skill set that will help Canales the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$$$ will be the issue in CIncy, but Chase has been vocal about the team re-signing Higgins.  That could mean some contract structures that include both players to accommodate it.  The Bengals could tag Higgins as well.  They are not likely to want to reduce the weaponry for their star QB.

On the other hand, they could look at the cost and realize that they can draft a good WR in this draft--WR is loaded.  But you really aim for consistency and Higgins is between 25 and 26....So I think they re-sign him.

As a GM, I would be circling the skies like a buzzard over these cities that are going to have to bend and stretch to sign their own marquee players; that usually means letting a lesser player or a good player at a lesser-need position walk.  That is really how you build a roster.   I am a frugal person, so I would stay out of free agency for the first three days--90% of the time you overpay.  Then I would go into it like a red neck at Wal-Mart on black Friday.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

$$$ will be the issue in CIncy, but Chase has been vocal about the team re-signing Higgins.  That could mean some contract structures that include both players to accommodate it.  The Bengals could tag Higgins as well.  They are not likely to want to reduce the weaponry for their star QB.

On the other hand, they could look at the cost and realize that they can draft a good WR in this draft--WR is loaded.  But you really aim for consistency and Higgins is between 25 and 26....So I think they re-sign him.

As a GM, I would be circling the skies like a buzzard over these cities that are going to have to bend and stretch to sign their own marquee players; that usually means letting a lesser player or a good player at a lesser-need position walk.  That is really how you build a roster.   I am a frugal person, so I would stay out of free agency for the first three days--90% of the time you overpay.  Then I would go into it like a red neck at Wal-Mart on black Friday.

This! ^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

$$$ will be the issue in CIncy, but Chase has been vocal about the team re-signing Higgins.  That could mean some contract structures that include both players to accommodate it.  The Bengals could tag Higgins as well.  They are not likely to want to reduce the weaponry for their star QB.

On the other hand, they could look at the cost and realize that they can draft a good WR in this draft--WR is loaded.  But you really aim for consistency and Higgins is between 25 and 26....So I think they re-sign him.

As a GM, I would be circling the skies like a buzzard over these cities that are going to have to bend and stretch to sign their own marquee players; that usually means letting a lesser player or a good player at a lesser-need position walk.  That is really how you build a roster.   I am a frugal person, so I would stay out of free agency for the first three days--90% of the time you overpay.  Then I would go into it like a red neck at Wal-Mart on black Friday.

walmart GIF

walmart GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Higgins is definitely a good player but I don't know if I would break the bank for him. If any team besides the Bengals sign him, it will be for a contract higher than the value he has shown so far on the hope that he can emerge as a number 1 receiver. He may or he may not, who knows.....Ever notice how many of the guys who sign the biggest contracts in the first few days of free agency usually never give their team the value that they paid? It just scares me to sign him to something monstrous as thats what it will take more than likely. Could we potentially learn to draft and develop wide receivers for a change and find us some great guys in the upcoming draft? Teams do it regularly. Look at all the rookie wide receivers who played wonderfully this season. Could we potentially draft a very good one and actually not have to break the bank in free agency instead? It's a gamble either way I know but I would rather go the draft way and hope somebody scouting actually knows what the heck they are looking for and can actually SCOUT for a change when it comes sti wide receivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

why would he (or evans) come here?  It literally makes no sense

With a great WR draft and feeling like we don’t even have our future WB in house, it doesn’t make sense. That said, we are down a 1st round pick in what someone on ESPN just said is a super talented draft, so who knows what we’ll do. It does hurt know long we could have had 3 top 33 picks in an epic draft class full of stud WRs, OTs and CBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd put Higgins in the DJ Moore tier. 

I mean, I'd take him.  I'm still not sure how much he really helps Bryce.  I think with Bryce we really need to spread the field and give up some quick WRs/RBs to fixate on small ball.  That's what he is at this level.  A dink and dunk QB.  We need some slot speed and a stud TE IMO paired up w/ a receiving RB (and we got zero parts for that trio). 

Ultimately, I think Higgins stays in Cincy

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I think Higgins is definitely a good player but I don't know if I would break the bank for him. If any team besides the Bengals sign him, it will be for a contract higher than the value he has shown so far on the hope that he can emerge as a number 1 receiver. He may or he may not, who knows.....Ever notice how many of the guys who sign the biggest contracts in the first few days of free agency usually never give their team the value that they paid? It just scares me to sign him to something monstrous as thats what it will take more than likely. Could we potentially learn to draft and develop wide receivers for a change and find us some great guys in the upcoming draft? Teams do it regularly. Look at all the rookie wide receivers who played wonderfully this season. Could we potentially draft a very good one and actually not have to break the bank in free agency instead? It's a gamble either way I know but I would rather go the draft way and hope somebody scouting actually knows what the heck they are looking for and can actually SCOUT for a change when it comes sti wide receivers.

WR1 has become the new QB1.  You have to draft them and play them on their rookie deals for 4/5 years.  Once they’re up for their second contract, they’re replaceable.

WR is the sexy position in high school and college, NFL mindset needs to adapt.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone help me understand - what exactly do many of you mean when you say Tee Higgins hasn't shown you he can be a #1 receiver yet?  His rookie year he was 28th in the league in yardage...next 2 years he was 17th and 20th even while missing 3 total games and being the 2nd option on his team.

If that isn't the production of a #1 caliber guy what is?  He was literally more productive than half the teams' #1 guy the last 2 seasons before he was injured in 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tomcatn said:

Was Agent #89 the last honest to God #1 WR we've had? It's been so long ago that I can't remember. Biggest dawg IMHO the Panthers ever had. I miss those days

only in a world where DJ Moore hitting a window where he was the only WR in the entire NFL to log 3 straight 1100+ seasons is viewed as a #2 WR (with trash QB play). 

DJ Moore was #1.  Is a #1.   A #1 isn't defined as a top 5 WR only. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CRA said:

only in a world where DJ Moore hitting a window where he was the only WR in the entire NFL to log 3 straight 1100+ seasons is viewed as a #2 WR (with trash QB play). 

DJ Moore was #1.  Is a #1.   A #1 isn't defined as a top 5 WR only. 

Yeah I would say DJ was our only other true #1 since Smitty - and you can BOLD, underline, and italicize that "trash QB play" part.

Edited by Stingray3030
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
×
×
  • Create New...