Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darin Gantt and Adam Gold on Morgan, Canales, and the Panthers at the combine


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not a ton of substance in the 13 min video but I did find it interesting he mentioned the number 1 priority on defense is finding pass rush outside of Burns. He mentioned if we trade Burns we have an even more massive hole, but did bring up that we didn’t have a single game where the offense from the opposite team having to come from behind to score points. This absolutely made the stats for Burns drop some, and it is crazy to think about. Not once was Burns able to get after the opposite team in the 4th quarter when they had to throw to win, because we were playing from behind in all 17 games, not to mention not having ANYONE opposite of Burns.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Not a ton of substance in the 13 min video but I did find it interesting he mentioned the number 1 priority on defense is finding pass rush outside of Burns. He mentioned if we trade Burns we have an even more massive hole, but did bring up that we didn’t have a single game where the offense from the opposite team having to come from behind to score points. This absolutely made the stats for Burns drop some, and it is crazy to think about. Not once was Burns able to get after the opposite team in the 4th quarter when they had to throw to win, because we were playing from behind in all 17 games, not to mention not having ANYONE opposite of Burns.

Meanwhile, Brian Burns defending the run

drive-over-run-over.gif

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The perspective on Burns was interesting. We need someone on the other side if we keep him and if we don't then we have to find two pass rushers.

Also pointed out that this defense is basically going back to what Capers ran here in the 90s and we have to have that two pronged pass rush.

So now I'm like...

GIF by Harlem Globetrotters

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Meanwhile, Brian Burns defending the run

drive-over-run-over.gif

 

That can't be Burns:

1) The guy actually slowed the progress. 

2) If it was Burns, he'd be racing past the runner, then past the QB.

3) This guy made contact with somebody

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Not a ton of substance in the 13 min video but I did find it interesting he mentioned the number 1 priority on defense is finding pass rush outside of Burns. He mentioned if we trade Burns we have an even more massive hole, but did bring up that we didn’t have a single game where the offense from the opposite team having to come from behind to score points. This absolutely made the stats for Burns drop some, and it is crazy to think about. Not once was Burns able to get after the opposite team in the 4th quarter when they had to throw to win, because we were playing from behind in all 17 games, not to mention not having ANYONE opposite of Burns.

What we do know however is that Burns is not in the top 20 for pass rush win rate at edge and obviously not ranked for run stop win rate. 

While Brown just makes the top 20 for DT pass run win rate and was #1 at run stop win rate.

There are edge players who are in top of both pass rush and run stopping and here we have people claiming Burns is an elite player and should be paid as such......elite at what?

 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38356170/2023-nfl-pass-rush-run-stop-blocking-win-rate-rankings-top-players-teams

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

The perspective on Burns was interesting. We need someone on the other side if we keep him and if we don't then we have to find two pass rushers.

Also pointed out that this defense is basically going back to what Capers ran here in the 90s and we have to have that two pronged pass rush.

So now I'm like...

GIF by Harlem Globetrotters

There isn't a whole lot in common between Evero's gap and a half scheme and the traditional 3-4 Capers ran  other than both being considered 3-4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, csx said:

What we do know however is that Burns is not in the top 20 for pass rush win rate at edge and obviously not ranked for run stop win rate. 

While Brown just makes the top 20 for DT pass run win rate and was #1 at run stop win rate.

There are edge players who are in top of both pass rush and run stopping and here we have people claiming Burns is an elite player and should be paid as such......elite at what?

 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38356170/2023-nfl-pass-rush-run-stop-blocking-win-rate-rankings-top-players-teams

Brian Burns Football GIF by Carolina Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...