Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Mock Offseason 2024


Jay Roosevelt
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's surprising to me how much both the fanbase and the team seem to be overlooking the TE position. Hurst is an absolute bust of a FA signing and anyone paying attention saw that coming. Ian Thomas was an absolute bust of a re-signing and anyone paying attention saw that coming. Tremble is a #2 TE at best and would be fighting to hang onto a roster spot at #3 on a good roster.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's surprising to me how much both the fanbase and the team seem to be overlooking the TE position. Hurst is an absolute bust of a FA signing and anyone paying attention saw that coming. Ian Thomas was an absolute bust of a re-signing and anyone paying attention saw that coming. Tremble is a #2 TE at best and would be fighting to hang onto a roster spot at #3 on a good roster.

Agreed. We've got to get a good TE in here. Something we can't afford to overlook.  Even if it's like Jared Wiley. Just get one here.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some decent TEs in FA.  Hopefully it's a soft market and we can get one of the better dudes at a reasonable price if we can hold our water and not sling money at players on the outset of FA.  I was always skeptical of Hurst because as a former 1st round pick, he's been passed around more than a hooker at a naval port.  Dudes that bounce around that much, considering he's not that old, usually raises a huge red flag for me.  I know he was dinged up a bit last season, but even when healthy made little impact on our offense.

image.png.74f9fc301a452bcf10e338455551f432.png

Edited by 45catfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I was on board with most of this, however, I don't like the Irving pick or double dipping at OL.  You cut Thomas (I agree) but did nothing to replace him in the draft or FA.

In all fairness, you don’t have to do anything to replace Ian Thomas. 

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greenard or Huff make a lot of sense in FA.  Those two are my favorite targets for us overall, not just at EDGE.  Need more consistent pressure on D.  

Unsure how realistic the Burns trade is.  Think we net a future 1st for him if something happens, but it won't be a 2024 1st.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Newbie said:

In all fairness, you don’t have to do anything to replace Ian Thomas. 

Agreed with the cheekiness of your comment, but we do need a TE though if he's released.  Sorry, but consistently banged up Hurst and a bunch of JAGs won't cut it.  A day 3 TE in this draft isn't exactly plug and play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Agreed with the cheekiness of your comment, but we do need a TE though if he's released.  Sorry, but consistently banged up Hurst and a bunch of JAGs won't cut it.  A day 3 TE in this draft isn't exactly plug and play.

I agree, but sadly we only have two picks on day two.  I guess it would have to be BPA between these three groups (OL,WR,TE) or BPA on a player that dropped well below his initial grade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

There are some decent TEs in FA.  Hopefully it's a soft market and we can get one of the better dudes at a reasonable price if we can hold our water and not sling money at players on the outset of FA.  I was always skeptical of Hurst because as a former 1st round pick, he's been passed around more than a hooker at a naval port.  Dudes that bounce around that much, considering he's not that old, usually raises a huge red flag for me.  I know he was dinged up a bit last season, but even when healthy made little impact on our offense.

image.png.74f9fc301a452bcf10e338455551f432.png

This list leaves a lot to be desired in my opinion. Unless Tremble develops, we'll be talking about drafting someone in 2025 if we patch things up with one of these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I agree, but sadly we only have two picks on day two.  I guess it would have to be BPA between these three groups (OL,WR,TE) or BPA on a player that dropped well below his initial grade. 

I'm against a TE before round 4 just because we are draft pick poor.   I want WR and RB or EDGE respectfully in rounds 2 and 3.  I would like to trade back once to get an extra pick, Ideally #65, and pick up an additional 4th getting back to four picks by say, selection 120.  That way we can get our WR, RB/EDGE and TE before it gets lean in round 5.  Even then we can get a good CB in the 5th since it's so deep of a class.  Our 6th will simply be BPA as these dudes are flyer picks.  Best OL/DL left on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...