Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Giants looking to trade for Brian Burns


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, La Pantera said:

Gave you names . Not doing goddamn math for you… none of those guys are getting more than a couple year contracts. 
 

guess we’ll just have to see how it plays out.

 

edit: Huff got 50 mill( 1/3 Burns money) over 3 years. Most of those guys will be under that 

They won't come to Carolina for that price, bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

It sounds like no other team was willing to trade AND give Burns $100+ contract so Morgan and co. had to settle for this trade package 

What other expectation was there really? People are just blowing months of steam knowing that there were 2 bad outcomes of that mess, overpaid or under valued in a trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its funny to me that the same people who were using the argument that Burns was actually good because these other teams valued him so highly are the same ones saying we should have kept him because the compensation wasnt enough.   Looks like they were wrong on both parts.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

Its funny to me that the same people who were using the argument that Burns was actually good because these other teams valued him so highly are the same ones saying we should have kept him because the compensation wasnt enough.   Looks like they were wrong on both parts.

Panthers lose no matter if they signed him to 30per or trade him for a 2nd+5th. 

It should have never gotten here- either traded him for that rams haul or you must resign him two years ago with what have been a 20per million bargain today. But its the Panthers and for the past few years they have made bad decisions yearly. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Panthers lose no matter if they signed him to 30per or trade him for a 2nd+5th. 

It should have never gotten here- either traded him for that rams haul or you must resign him two years ago with what have been a 20per million bargain today. But its the Panthers and for the past few years they have made bad decisions yearly. 

I agree, i think it was in the top 2 bad decisions in Panthers history,  i felt that since the day the details were mentioned, but that was a different decision makers and the past offer has nothing to do with the current one.   It was in the past.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Youngs Ten Yard Bombs said:

Ahhh I remember the douche bags who were so excited about Fitterer turning down the Rams offer of 2 first rounders and a second and actually argued that Burns value would only go higher lmao.

 

I wouldn't call them d bags. That's a little harsh.

But only elite QBs are really worth 2 first rounders and a second. Burns was never gonna live up to that haul. Heck, 13 sacks a season wouldn't have been enough to justify that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Basbear said:

Panthers lose no matter if they signed him to 30per or trade him for a 2nd+5th. 

It should have never gotten here- either traded him for that rams haul or you must resign him two years ago with what have been a 20per million bargain today. But its the Panthers and for the past few years they have made bad decisions yearly. 

Agreed, and making the deal to move up last year would have been a lot easier if we had the Rams picks.   We might have even been able to keep DJ.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Been here since middle school right when it started around 2003 after the charlotte.com one. Living outside of Carolina it was tough to find good Panthers content, news or analysis. And no one to talk to about it. This place gave me a lot though I don’t often post. In the later days, I particularly Loved PhillyB’s write ups. They were fire. Too bad I go let it go. I appreciate the hell out of @MHS831 @TheSpecialJuan @Jackie Lee and others who have been posting great content and keeping this place worth coming back to. Particularly during the offseason. Appreciate y’all!
    • Nice explanation, but I was just messing with you. Thought that would be obvious. I dont have the energy to keep on trolling. Last season I compared our situation with Bryce as a potential Alex Smith, but what we should be looking for is our version of Mahomes. Some people will read that as one sentence, to me that single sentence is equivalent to a half A4 explanationf of the teams pathway forward.
    • I dont know how much of his salary would come across and how much a trade would cost but I feel Kmet would be the sort of TE Canales and Morgan would like 
×
×
  • Create New...