Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Williams rumor


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, strato said:

What do you think they are doing? 

attempting to build a stereotypical offense for their non-stereotypical QB? 

I mean, I’m ready to move on from Bryce so I don’t really care.   But yeah, I’ve been clear since we drafted him the the only way I think Young can work is to to build him a Bryce dink and dunk O with their scheme and talent. 

Big picture,  we are going to likely have better interior OL play and slightly better playcalling.  

I mean, this is a Mike Williams thread.  What type of O did  Canales run  in Tampa?  The only addition skill talent wise to date is problem wideout the Steelers tried to deal for a year and couldn’t that plays on the outside.  Big picture I don’t dislike what they are doing to fix the O…but it’s still IMO a variation of last year where it’s not going to be catering to an anomaly QB.  

I think we drafted an anomaly QB….and still have not come to terms with that. 

and the talk/mood just feels like last year on repeat for me.  I was never it’s an all Bryce Young sucks guy either.  I didn’t like what they were putting him into from the jump when so many were talking playoffs and best roster since 2003 type stuff.  I still don’t like what they are putting him in….at least to date.  I don’t think we are going to put him in position again this year to help him reach his potential. 
 

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Canales has thrived with Metcalf and Evans. So he would be a massive add for us to fill that role 

Metcalf and Evans thrived with risking taking QBs that went vertical.  Not sure a WR to fill that role is a big hole on a Bryce Young lead offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

attempting to build a stereotypical offense for their non-stereotypical QB? 

I mean, I’m ready to move on from Bryce so I don’t really care.   But yeah, I’ve been clear since we drafted him the the only way I think Young can work is to to build him a Bryce dink and dunk O with their scheme and talent. 

Big picture,  we are going to likely have better interior OL play and slightly better playcalling.  

I mean, this is a Mike Williams thread.  What type of O did  Canales run  in Tampa?  The only addition skill talent wise to date is problem wideout the Steelers tried to deal for a year and couldn’t that plays on the outside.  Big picture I don’t dislike what they are doing to fix the O…but it’s still IMO a variation of last year where it’s not going to be catering to an anomaly QB.  

I think we drafted an anomaly QB….and still have not come to terms with that. 

and the talk/mood just feels like last year on repeat for me.  I was never it’s an all Bryce Young sucks guy either.  I didn’t like what they were putting him into from the jump when so many were talking playoffs and best roster since 2003 type stuff.  I still don’t like what they are putting him in….at least to date.  I don’t think we are going to put him in position again this year to help him reach his potential. 
 

 

They're making these moves so there's no excuses for him. This time next year if bryce didn't improve substantially, we'll be moving on. At least the next qb may have a decent line and some weapons to work with

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

They're making these moves so there's no excuses for him. This time next year if bryce didn't improve substantially, we'll be moving on. At least the next qb may have a decent line and some weapons to work with

the next QB wont be for another 15 years. These OL players will all have their knee replacements by then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

They're making these moves so there's no excuses for him. This time next year if bryce didn't improve substantially, we'll be moving on. At least the next qb may have a decent line and some weapons to work with

well, last year there was no excuses for him not to sleepwalk to the playoffs with the best roster since 2003/2011 assembled around him.   Like, I said, this all just feels the same. 

Canales didn't run a O last year that seems ideal for Bryce Young.  Skill talent is largely the same.  We replaced Chark with a more talented headache on the outside.   And that outside WR spot isn't the main bread and butter of an anomaly like Bryce IMO. 

But there is time.  Everything I'm seeing and hearing to date though, seems like this O would be better suited for Jake Delhomme Jr.   

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

well, last year there was no excuses for him not to sleepwalk to the playoffs with the best roster since 2003/2011 assembled around him.   Like, I said, this all just feels the same. 

Canales didn't run a O last year that seems ideal for Bryce Young.  Skill talent is largely the same.  We replaced Chark with a more talented headache on the outside.   And that outside WR spot isn't the main bread and butter of an anomaly like Bryce IMO. 

But there is time.  Everything I'm seeing and hearing to date though, seems like this O would be better suited for Jake Delhomme Jr.   

 

Yeah, we haven't even had the draft yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, uncfan888 said:

At least he and Jaycee can play battleship together in the physical therapy room after week 3

Could be.

But he's my consolation red zone signing since we are back to the TE position being pretty much a black hole again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CRA said:

attempting to build a stereotypical offense for their non-stereotypical QB? 

I mean, I’m ready to move on from Bryce so I don’t really care.   But yeah, I’ve been clear since we drafted him the the only way I think Young can work is to to build him a Bryce dink and dunk O with their scheme and talent. 

Big picture,  we are going to likely have better interior OL play and slightly better playcalling.  

I mean, this is a Mike Williams thread.  What type of O did  Canales run  in Tampa?  The only addition skill talent wise to date is problem wideout the Steelers tried to deal for a year and couldn’t that plays on the outside.  Big picture I don’t dislike what they are doing to fix the O…but it’s still IMO a variation of last year where it’s not going to be catering to an anomaly QB.  

I think we drafted an anomaly QB….and still have not come to terms with that. 

and the talk/mood just feels like last year on repeat for me.  I was never it’s an all Bryce Young sucks guy either.  I didn’t like what they were putting him into from the jump when so many were talking playoffs and best roster since 2003 type stuff.  I still don’t like what they are putting him in….at least to date.  I don’t think we are going to put him in position again this year to help him reach his potential. 
 

 

Terrible take, they purposely spent a lot of resources to address the guard position for an anomaly QB. They also targeted a WR that meshes well with Bryce's skillset of anticipation. They are going to fuging feast on curl, slants, and out routes together, mark my words. The addition of Johnson is more coherent than any addition we made in the 2022 offseason, which I absolutely hated, including the trade-up to #1 months before the draft. Morgan did the best he could do and honestly, has us in position to reset in 2025 if we need to and the cap space to make the necessary moves if it blows up with Bryce. We actually have assets if this thing blows up this time.

Time will tell now if Bryce is worth a damn or not, especially if we can wrap this thing up with Mike Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Terrible take, they purposely spent a lot of resources to address the guard position for an anomaly QB. They also targeted a WR that meshes well with Bryce's skillset of anticipation. They are going to fuging feast on curl, slants, and out routes together, mark my words. The addition of Johnson is more coherent than any addition we made in the 2022 offseason, which I absolutely hated, including the trade-up to #1 months before the draft. Morgan did the best he could do and honestly, has us in position to reset in 2025 if we need to and the cap space to make the necessary moves if it blows up with Bryce. We actually have assets if this thing blows up this time.

Time will tell now if Bryce is worth a damn or not, especially if we can wrap this thing up with Mike Williams.

I mean, the issues going into last year were always going to be the issues.  The parts didn't fit.  The talent and scheme didn't fit the QB.  You could of given Bryce better G play last year......almost all the issues still largely exist. 

I've acknowledged we should have better G play.   

Talk about signing Mike Wiliams....is just repeating the problems of last year.  Mike doesn't fit a Bryce Young O IMO.   And as I said, I love Mike Williams.   

We gave up the farm for a small ball QB.  And have no intention to build an O that does it.  That to me, remains a terrible idea. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a list of prospects the #Panthers met with in the 2026 cycle: #KeepPounding  Senior Bowl Meetings: RB Adam Randall (Clemson) WR Ted Hurst (Georgia State) WR Jordan Hudson (SMU) TE Justin Joly (NC State) TE Eli Raridon (Notre Dame) TE John Michael Gyllenborg (Wyoming) OT Kage Casey (Boise State) OT Austin Barber (Florida) OT Jude Bowry (Boston College)  OG Keylan Rutledge (Georgia Tech)  OL Delby Lemieux (Dartmouth)  EDGE Derrick Moore (Michigan) EDGE Romello Height (Texas Tech) EDGE Gabe Jacas (Illinois) DT Caleb Banks (Florida) DT Rayshaun Benny (Michigan)  LB Jacob Rodriguez (Texas Tech) LB Kyle Louis (Pittsburgh) S Jalon Kilgore (South Carolina) Hula Bowl Meetings: WR Camden Brown (GSU) OT Reuben Unije (UCLA) IOL Fintan Brose (Delaware) EDGE Nathan Voorhis (Ball State)  EDGE Michael Heldman (CMU) DB Gavin Gibson (UNC) American Bowl Meetings: IOL Kobe Baynes (Kansas) OL Austin Leausa (BYU) C Nick Dawkins (Penn State) CB Elijah Culp (JMU) CB Rashad Battle (Pitt) CB Al’zillion Hamilton (Fresno State) CB Ayden Garnes (Arizona) CB DJ Harvey (USC)  Shrine Bowl Meetings: WR Emmanuel Henderson (Kansas) WR J Michael Sturdivant (Florida)  OT Tristan Leigh (Clemson) OL Brian Parker (Duke)  EDGE Mason Reiger (Wisconsin) DL Kaleb Proctor (Southeastern Louisiana) DT Landon Robinson (Navy) DT Brandon Cleveland (NC State) DT Darrell Jackson Jr. (FSU)  LB West Weeks (LSU) CB Andre Fuller (Toledo) CB Ahmari Harvey (Georgia Tech) CB Brent Austin (California) DB Marcus Allen (UNC) S Jalen Huskey (UMD) Zoom Meetings:  QB Sawyer Robertson (Baylor) RB Emmett Johnson (Nebraska) WR De’Zhaun Stribling (Ole Miss)  WR CJ Daniels (Miami)  OT Travis Burke (Memphis) OT Carver Willis (Washington)  EDGE Wesley Williams (Duke) LB Khalil Jacobs (Missouri) LB Wesley Bissainthe (Miami)  CB Malik Muhammad (Texas) CB Collin Wright (Stanford)  Notable Pro Days Attended: Utah (OL Coaches) Clemson (OL Coaches) Alabama (OL Coach)  Texas (Dan Morgan) Texas Tech (Dan Morgan)  Pro Day Meetings: WR Malik Benson (Oregon) WR Kajiya Hollawayne (Temple)  WR Decorian Clark (UTSA) TE Oscar Delp (UGA)  OL Jake Eichorn (Utah State) OG Walker Parks (Clemson)  EDGE Zion Young (Missouri)  EDGE Dion Wilson Jr. (Syracuse) DT Lee Hunter (Texas Tech)  DL Kevin Jobity Jr. (Syracuse) CB Thaddeus Dixon (UNC) S Ike Larsen (Utah State) K Chris Freeman (UConn)  P Anthony Beacom (WMU) Showing Interest: WR Maurice Massey (Ind. University of PA) DE Quindarius Dunnigan (MSU) EDGE Mason Reiger (Wisconsin) EDGE Colby Taylor (West Florida) CB Rashad Battle (Pittsburgh)  Combine Meetings:  QB Sawyer Robertson (Baylor, Informal) DT Kayden McDonald (OSU, Formal) EDGE Keldric Faulk (Auburn) LB Sonny Styles (OSU) LB Jacob Rodriguez (Texas Tech) LB Kaleb Elarms-Orr (TCU, Formal) LB Jimmy Rolder (Michigan, Formal)  LB Jake Golday (Cincinnati, Formal)  CB Daylen Everette (UGA, Formal) S Genesis Smith (Arizona, Formal) Met with at some point during draft process:  QB Jalon Daniels (Kansas) WR Caleb Douglas (Texas Tech) WR Reggie Virgil (Texas Tech) WR Tre’Shawn Watson (Minn. State) TE Dallas Bentley (Utah)  EDGE Keyshawn James-Newby (UNM) EDGE Tyreak Sapp (Florida) DT Jayden Loving (Wake Forest) LB Bryce Boettcher (Oregon) S Louis Frye (Temple) Top 30 Visits:  QB Diego Pavia (Vanderbilt) QB Haynes King (Georgia Tech) QB Behren Morton (Texas Tech) RB Kaelon Black (Indiana) WR Omar Cooper (Indiana)  WR Denzel Boston (Washington)  WR Chris Brazzell II (Tennessee)  WR Deion Burks (Oklahoma)  TE Oscar Delp (UGA) TE Dae’Quan Wright (Ole Miss) TE Justin Joly (NC State) OT Max Iheanachor (Arizona State) OT Travis Burke (Memphis)  OG Chase Bisontis (Texas A&M)  EDGE Keyron Crawford (Auburn) DT Tyler Onyedim (Texas A&M) DT Chris McClellan (Missouri) DT Domonique Orange (Iowa State) CB Jermod McCoy (Tennessee) DB Treydan Stukes (Arizona)  S AJ Haulcy (LSU)  Local Visits:  WR KC Concepcion (Texas A&M) DT Nick Barrett (South Carolina)  CB Karon Prunty (Wake Forest) DB Jalon Kilgore (South Carolina) https://x.com/panthersbreakd/status/2044118568090927123?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA
    • Oddly feeling really good about tonight. fug the heat
    • Here are my takeaways from the conference (IMO): - Is Dan against taking a WR 3 years in a row? No. Would that be his preference? Also, no. Not by a long shot.  - I think draft gurus are wrong. Tight end is not an early priority. They like the guys in the building enough to see them develop, but a later round guy is being looked at (just seemed like he was able to label a couple of guys "talented", but stopped short of suggesting the class is good at the top. Seemed quick to talk about the depth of the class) - If we are taking a DL, it will be in the top 2 rounds. They fall off a cliff at some point soon after. - They are targeting guys in each round. I think we are more likely to move up than down in this draft to prevent missing out on a guy. He doesn't want to give up a lot though, man loves his draft picks. - DBs are a priority. We want to come away with a safety and a nickel. Maybe even a safety that can play nickel. Thieneman sounds more and more like a real possibility, if he is there. We are taking a safety in the first 2 rounds, if I had to put money on it. - Age matters more for 1st round picks, probably (Mesidor), but not for after that (Stukes). - They have a guy or two that they want in the 1st round, but crazy things DO happen in the draft, and they may shift gears and take a different guy if someone falls that they didn't expect to be there.  - Character matters. A LOT. If a guy has character concerns of any kind, you can be pretty confident they aren't on our board. They may bring in a guy or two for a visit to gauge the validity/severity of the concern though.      
×
×
  • Create New...