Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dane Brugler The Beast Draft guide is out today


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Legette probably needs two or three seasons before we see something closer to his final form. There are others that will contribute a lot sooner. 

Hes also a month older than Mingo.   Drafting old "raw" players was the style of the previous regime.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

Hes also a month older than Mingo.   Drafting old "raw" players was the style of the previous regime.

Considering we sent like 75 guys to his pro day, it must be in this regimes wheelhouse as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

Hes also a month older than Mingo.   Drafting old "raw" players was the style of the previous regime.

Yeah I think they're going to have enough growing pains with reworking Bryce and installing a new playbook/learning how to be a head coach to worry about teaching a guy how to run routes. They might want him for kick return after 33 I guess. I could see him falling to 65 as well but then I might be looking at Pearsall if we go BPA with our top two picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the draft was true to his rankings, here’s my wish:

#33 - trade down to mid/late 2nd (acquire an additional 2025 2nd + 2024 4th)

#39 - WR Xavier Worthy

Newly acquired 2nd - CB TJ Tampa

#65 - WR Xavier Legette

#101 - TE Ben Sinnott

Newly acquired 4th - LB Cedric Gray

#141 - EDGE Eric Watts

#142 - LB James Williams

#240 - RB Jawhar Jordan

 

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Some of the WRs connected to Panthers in Mocks or on this site.  

Interesting Ladd listed as WR #5

Mitchell is #6

Roman Wilson gets love as #8 so many simulators have him lower.  

Pearsall, Worthy, Corey, and Franklin come in as 9, 10, 11, and 12

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

Considering we sent like 75 guys to his pro day, it must be in this regimes wheelhouse as well. 

Yea thats my biggest fear/worst case scenario with the Morgan promotion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...