Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Select Ja'Tavion Sanders TE - Pick 101, Round 4


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, shaq said:

Wasn’t the biggest Sanders guy when I thought he was going in the second round. But, this is a great pick here can’t complain at the value here. Sanders and Tremble is a great duo between their abilities.

I think this has the potential to be like the Olsen/Shockey combo Cam had his rookie year.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shaq said:

Wasn’t the biggest Sanders guy when I thought he was going in the second round. But, this is a great pick here can’t complain at the value here. Sanders and Tremble is a great duo between their abilities.

Same, I thought 4th was good value and he might even be our first starter of the draft

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Trotter is available for a reason.  Being an off-ball linebacker with such deficiencies in coverage is not appealing.  

Wallace is really good in coverage. Lots of good instincts and natural talent to build on there.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rayzor said:

What's funny about this is that people have been arguing that we're still only looking at RAS scores and nothing has changed since Fitt.

I think that’s just a Tepper top down thing.  The business guy and he dictates a lot. And you see it all over what they do IMO.   A guy here or there is always an exception to anything. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Trotter is available for a reason.  Being an off-ball linebacker with such deficiencies in coverage is not appealing.  

Without actually thinking hard on it,  Trotter was probably the 5th - 7th best guy on that Clemson front.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We won 5 with the worst defense in the history of defenses.  I think free agency and our draft puts us over 6.5.
    • Leaning towards just ordering this tonight, but now I have no idea on size. Has anyone bought a bunch of jerseys in the last few years and can convey how the Game vs Limited vs Reebok versions all fit? These are both Mediums... The white one here is a Reebok one from 2010, and was when they had the "+2 length" on the tag and it was the version with the stitched numbers instead of iron on... the blue one is from 2022 and is the F.U.S.E Limited version also with stitched stuff, not the "game jersey" with the ironed on numbers/letters that they have the T-Mac jerseys in. The old one fits me fine, the blue one was always a tad snug on me, particularly in the shoulders I'm leaning going with a Large based on the CMC, but for all I know, that is made with a tighter cut due to the higher "limited" level and the "game" ones they have for T-Mac are cut more like a T-Shirt and thus will fit more like the old white one I have here, not sure. (and yes, I already tried going to a sporting goods store here to hopefully try on a Lions jersey to see, but they don't have any right now)
    • I think there's a ton of potential in that WR room. But they really are unproven right now. Hopefully they live up to the hype.
×
×
  • Create New...