Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another Reason The Panthers May have Traded Up To Get Legette

SaltAndPepper

By SaltAndPepper,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
travisura Grand Master

travisura

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Word on the street is that Beane called Morgan when he got word that the Patriots wanted to move up for Legette. Morgan gets to move up for relatively cheap to get his guy, Beane gets to move back and still get his guy, and the Pats get screwed over. Win, win, win.

  • Pie 57
  • Beer 6
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

i love it.

in a draft where you screw over the pats and the cowboys and rip off the rams, i think we did good.

i don't have a problem with the rams, btw. but it was nice not getting the bad end of a deal like that deal for once.

  • Pie 35
  • Beer 3
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted

Buffalo not being all nice to New England?  In what world would people expect a team to treat their divisional competitors fairly? 

When have those New England bastards ever done anything but work to undermine their competitors? 

Buffalo should be trading with someone on New England’s schedule hoping to help deal them a loss, and New England is supposed to know that.  If anyone in New England is whining about it... lol.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, travisura said:

Word on the street is that Beane called Morgan when he got word that the Patriots wanted to move up for Legette. Morgan gets to move up for relatively cheap to get his guy, Beane gets to move back and still get his guy, and the Pats get screwed over. Win, win, win.

Should have called his bluff and picked Cooper DeJean if the Patriots traded up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TD alt Grand Master

TD alt

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, rayzor said:

i love it.

in a draft where you screw over the pats and the cowboys and rip off the rams, i think we did good.

i don't have a problem with the rams, btw. but it was nice not getting the bad end of a deal like that deal for once.

I respect the Rams though. They got their guy. Scouts really liked Braden Fiske. 

Sometimes---probably all the time---you can't pay those value charts any mind.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoKnows Grand Master

WhoKnows

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, rayzor said:

i love it.

in a draft where you screw over the pats and the cowboys and rip off the rams, i think we did good.

i don't have a problem with the rams, btw. but it was nice not getting the bad end of a deal like that deal for once.

Slow your roll a little. Back in 2021, while many of us just wanted OL with almost every pick, there was a lot of cheering when we got TMJ right before the Saints.

We got all excited for Fittermagic and in the end, we got poo instead of a pro-bowl C many of us wanted and NO got a starting LB and had to double up in 2022 on WR and got Olave and Shaheed.

I don’t think we won the “screwing over” part of the draft then, and it worries me every time I see posts that mirror something we did in the Rhule, Hurney, Fitt and Reich periods.

Here’s to hoping for different results and yes, to all that think cautious hope is terrible, I do actually want Legette and every other move to succeed. The past 6 years has sucked balls.

Edited by WhoKnows
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Slow your roll a little. Back in 2021, while many of us just wanted OL with almost every pick, there was a lot of cheering when we got TMJ right before the Saints.

We got all excited for Fittermagic and in the end, we got poo instead of a pro-bowl C many of us wanted and NO got a starting LB and had to double up in 2022 on WR and got Olave and Shaheed.

I don’t think we won the “screwing over” part of the draft then, and it worries me every time I see posts that mirror something we did in the Rhule, Hurney, Fitt and Reich periods.

Here’s to hoping for different results and yes, to all that think cautious hope is terrible, I do actually want Legette and every other move to succeed. The past 6 years has sucked balls.

i ain't slowing nothing down. 

Go Faster Wallace And Gromit GIF by Aardman Animations

if it leads to a cliff...so be it.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saca312
      In addition to Evero there's one large change that likely should happen.

      By Saca312 · Posted

      It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Puresteel55
      Carolina Panthers pick No. 19-2026 NFL Draft

      By Puresteel55 · Posted

      Bryce Boetcher
    • TylerDurden
      CBS Sports brief discussion about questionable Canales decision making

      By TylerDurden · Posted

      Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...