Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Soccer players go into the stands at Bank of America stadium to fight with fans


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Lame Duck said:

Tepper failure made him top news on BBC.  Apparently Columbia fans begun abusing family members of Uruguayan players so Uruguayan players lead by world star Darwin Nunez who plays for Liverpool charged Columbian fans.

 

Uruguay captain José María Giménez said the players were trying to defend their families, describing the situation in the crowd as a "disaster", Reuters reported.

He continued: "There was no police and we had to defend our families. This is the fault of two or three people who had a few too many drinks and don't know how to drink."

Núñez was seen hugging his son on the pitch after the altercation.


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce78z0zg2ezo

 

image.jpeg.c6f3491912c40e50edcbeab2a78a8410.jpeg

This is a bs story.  Their families were never threatened.  

 

It was an incredible experience and loud af.  A brawl broke out on the ramps after the game that was wild.  Luckily it was broken up before people got seriously hurt.  im sure the cops had their hands full.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, fanpanther said:

Yeah this may not have been Teppers fault directly but whoever organized this and was in charge of security its a bad bad look took forever for security to even arrive.  With the way people get sloppy drunk at all these events cops should be everywhere throughout the game.  

the level of fan intensity was unreal.  BOF hasnt seen fans close to that since 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

Some bald old guy tossed a drink on one of the players which led to the ensuing melee. 

This.  The family stuff was to save face.  I saw several “almost” fights but both sides were to blame.  Soccer is a whole other level of loyalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lame Duck said:

Imagine a sport where you don’t get brain injuries, play 2 times per week for 11 months, and games uninterrupted by commercials?  And people call it stupid….

No commercials for 45+ min a half is one of the best things going in sports. NFL is almost unwatchable with all the commercials.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...