“Waiting on the owner”

[CRA]

6 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Tepper is the reason of everything g bad since he bought the franchise.  

 

Yup. That is sound logic there folks. 

 

Come slurp it up. 

10/10.  Would read again.  
 

pretty much.  Overly involved bad owners have negative impacts.  Sports and every other business.  In this case, it prevents winning football. 

[pantherclaw]

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

10/10.  Would read again.  
 

pretty much.  Overly involved bad owners have negative impacts.  Sports and every other business.  In this case, it prevents winning football. 

Roster management?  Wtfe

Ability to make the coaches coach great and together? Wife

Ability to make the players execute to the best of their ability? Wtfe

 

[KSpan]

28 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Roster management?  Wtfe

Ability to make the coaches coach great and together? Wife

Ability to make the players execute to the best of their ability? Wtfe

 

Who brought those incompetent people in, thinking he was outsmarting the league? 

Wtfe

Who has sure liked being in the spotlight when he thought he was doing something smart but then slinked to the shadows when he was revealed to have made yet another dumbass decision?

Wtfe

Will it change this year? Remains to be seen. But until it does yeah, the stench starts with Tepper, full stop.

[pantherclaw]

10 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Who brought those incompetent people in, thinking he was outsmarting the league? 

Wtfe

Who has sure liked being in the spotlight when he thought he was doing something smart but then slinked to the shadows when he was revealed to have made yet another dumbass decision?

Wtfe

Will it change this year? Remains to be seen. But until it does yeah, the stench starts with Tepper, full stop.

Yup.  Sure fuging sucks to be coached by the owner.   

[ForJimmy]

1 hour ago, HardcoreHokie said:

84.1% giving a D or an F isn’t exactly a “passing grade” in terms of this type of poll.

I just figured it would be a majority Fs. 

[mrcompletely11]

10 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Roster management?  Wtfe

Ability to make the coaches coach great and together? Wife

Ability to make the players execute to the best of their ability? Wtfe

 

Godalmighty 

[mrcompletely11]

10 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

This rams poo never bothered me. 

We know.  

[CRA]

10 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Roster management?  Wtfe

Ability to make the coaches coach great and together? Wife

Ability to make the players execute to the best of their ability? Wtfe

 

If an owner hires bad people...and they do a bad job.  That's still the owner.   And often they do a bad job, because the owner is setting or not setting the table for how their job will look.  That's why good and bad owners matter. 

for example, he hired Matt Rhule.  Then he allowed Rhule to build a completely incompetent NFL staff with predictable results.  Matt Rhule was a complete newb he didn't even know how to run a NFL practice.  He then allowed Rhule to do things like hire an OC he had never been an OC on any level.  So it becomes a series of bad marriages. 

Take Frank, a boring bland meh HC.  A bad hire.  What does Tepper do? Takes an old school set in his ways coach and forces him to go outside of what makes him bland yet competent.  Makes him hire an OC from someone else's coaching tree.  Forces a QB on him that doesn't pair with what he does. 

Now we got Canales, who no one even bothered to interview.  I put this down the Matt Rhule path. Not as extreme.   But you pair a newb HC with a newb OC with a newb/bad QB.  And again, you got a QB that doesn't pair with what the coaching staff does. 

Tepper is bad because Tepper is the king of putting bad marriages together.  Then bad things predictably happen.  You should be pairing things that mesh together.  Coaches and players (the ones the team is going to be tied to). 

[mc52beast]

Obviously this would be a non-issue if we weren’t the worst team in the League with an owner who hasn’t shown he knows how to run a franchise.

[Panthercougar68]

3 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Obviously this would be a non-issue if we weren’t the worst team in the League with an owner who hasn’t shown he knows how to run a franchise.

Winning cures all woes…see Browns, Saints, Lions, Bucs, Dolphins, Rams, Bengals, and so on and so on.

Edited July 20, 2024 by Panthercougar68

[TD alt]

On 7/17/2024 at 1:48 PM, Gapanthersfan said:

I was thinking this EXACT thought this am. We have a very kind sports media. 

Scott Fowler gives Tepper "the business," as well he should. He's not kind about it either, but Tepper was the author of that with his sourpuss attitude.

[strato]

8 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Winning cures all woes…see Browns, Saints, Lions, Bucs, Dolphins, Rams, Bengals, and so on and so on.

Oh good. So we are 6 years in.

I think that going one by one through their turnarounds would be educational. Some of those teams had decades of culture they had to reverse. 

[Donald LaFell]

On 7/17/2024 at 9:54 AM, ProcessBlue2 said:

Considering it was Brian Burns, I'm sure Tepper had to sign-off on it. There is probably 1-4 players on the roster with that status. I highly doubt he would have needed approval if it was somebody like DiCaprio Bootle.

You don’t just give up a name like that with checking with the big man