Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where is Zod?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 7/19/2024 at 8:42 PM, Captain Morgan said:

remember when Josh Norman came to Zod's draft party?  I don't know if any NFL team let's anyone get that far inside anymore.

Pretty sure there is a B-roll of the Norman podcast that never saw the light of day.
 

Actually I’m 100% sure there was a B-roll. Whether or not it still exists is the question.

Edited by zacka77ack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to check this place religiously. Now I maybe swing through like once a month. I'm sure I'll be back refreshing during training camp and the regular season.

Between the team and the general discourse around here sucking balls, I'm very apathetic towards this place when I used to love it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Floppin said:

I used to check this place religiously. Now I maybe swing through like once a month. I'm sure I'll be back refreshing during training camp and the regular season.

Between the team and the general discourse around here sucking balls, I'm very apathetic towards this place when I used to love it.

Are we just getting old and nostalgic?  It's just not the same

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/19/2024 at 10:08 PM, Lame Duck said:

This.  I deleted Facebook cause of that. I did not liked the way it evolved.  I’d like to control what I consume.  This place is the only social media I got.  If I ever get banned, I might have to find an actual hobby.  

We use facebook to communicate with distant family.

I found something called social fixer which allows me to filter out political and religious nonsense.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Floppin said:

I used to check this place religiously. Now I maybe swing through like once a month. I'm sure I'll be back refreshing during training camp and the regular season.

Between the team and the general discourse around here sucking balls, I'm very apathetic towards this place when I used to love it.

....Just go back to MySpace......

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Floppin said:

I used to check this place religiously. Now I maybe swing through like once a month. I'm sure I'll be back refreshing during training camp and the regular season.

Between the team and the general discourse around here sucking balls, I'm very apathetic towards this place when I used to love it.

I bet you are less vested into NFL as well.  I find myself caring less and less for football.  Mostly thanks to Tepper.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Lame Duck said:

I bet you are less vested into NFL as well.  I find myself caring less and less for football.  Mostly thanks to Tepper.

It's also the softening of the game for me.  The NFL peaked in the 2000s and I don't mean in terms of revenue

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, NAS said:

It's also the softening of the game for me.  The NFL peaked in the 2000s and I don't mean in terms of revenue

Yea, that too.  Also, Vegas has big influence on game outcomes as well.  Now, they are bringing Taylor Swift as the way to get young fans onboard.  The game is evolving into WWE/Flag football.  I recently start watching hockey and those guys play every 2 days and absolutely destroy each other and you never hear them whine.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2024 at 9:32 AM, Floppin said:

I used to check this place religiously. Now I maybe swing through like once a month. I'm sure I'll be back refreshing during training camp and the regular season.

Between the team and the general discourse around here sucking balls, I'm very apathetic towards this place when I used to love it.

I come back from time to time just to read your training camp story.  I've probably read it about 20 times.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...