Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adjusted 2024 Roster w/Projected Starters


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Yep we’ll see who sticks after the first few weeks on defense. The DB unit will be a bit fluid behind our starters but think we’re pretty set for Base, Nickel and Subpackages 

OLB is the thinnest. DJJ’s development will be key this year

Hopefully Wonnum comes back after week 4 and helps provide a spark. OLB is very dependent on Clowney who has had his share of injuries. CB is very dependent on Horn and we know his history… Also I think Smith-Wade was getting some looks on the outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rags said:

49ers fans are really upset Abt losing Kingston over on reddit fwiw. Felt he could've been depth now and an eventual starter. Apparently killed it in preseason and camp.

Really excited Abt getting him in that case.

I seen that too.

I've also noticed they picked up players high PFF scores too(ugh...) Maybe the new Eric Eager has a bigger role than people think. It felt like many of these were driven by Eager. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Hopefully Wonnum comes back after week 4 and helps provide a spark. OLB is very dependent on Clowney who has had his share of injuries. CB is very dependent on Horn and we know his history… Also I think Smith-Wade was getting some looks on the outside.

I think some these new additions (CB) have 4 weeks to prove themselves.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I think Dane Jackson is our original CB2 and probably gets his job back unless someone is playing great. 

I’d agree there.

Hill is a solid NB as well who can play outside if need be.  That would likely be the case if we didn’t trade for the second Jackson and then Chau would’ve been folded in a bit sooner than expected at Nickel. Problem being those packages are probably 60% of our snaps so it would’ve been a big role for a 5th rounder to be thrust into.

By doing what we did, 2 Jacksons can be outside if Horn goes down (once Dane is back) and Hill stays put. No musical chairs if a secondary starter goes down. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...