Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

So is a game not 60 minutes long?

We're being criticised now for pulling away in the 4Q? Why were Alabama / Georgia et al in their pomp not punished for that?

If you can point out the refereeing decisions that went in our favour I'd be much appreciated (and you can miss me with the clear non-catch against VT on a Hail Mary). 

Ward was a 5th round pick coming into this year. I think a few of you are going to be surprised what he actually does in the NFL - I love what he's done at Miami, but a great deal of what he's been able to achieve is because he's surrounded by very, very good players. 

Sure it is. But you aren’t a great team if you are having to pull away from ACC teams late in the 4th essentially every single week.   

Again, neutral field, they aren’t really even going to be favored over both SMU and Clemson IMO.   So what are you then?  

Miami might win the ACC. If you do, it’s the power of the QB spot. You got the best QB in likely the nation.  So congrats.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

What the Playoff Committee says they're going to do and what they actually do are almost certainly wildly different thigs. 

Ok.  I gotcha then.  Now I agree overall.  They will selectively punish.   Honestly, Miami would likely benefit simply because of Ward.  Better to have him in than not in.  If they beat Syracuse they are in….even with a loss to SMU.  Because of Ward.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mack ruined his legacy. Imagine how different he'd be viewed had he rode off into the sunset and handed a hot up and coming coach Drake Maye. He was hired to put the program back on the right track and be a stop gap to the future. Instead he just lucked into a couple of NFL QBs and then hung around to drag us right back into the gutter.

https://www.si.com/college/unc/football/unc-football-recruiting-efforts-look-crumbling-11-24

If he's not willing to retire, fire him. But we have to move on and now we're on a worse spot to land a good coach than we were a couple of years ago when Mack should've logically retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling my gamecocks are going to be over emotional and dare I say, reckless.

It’s been a good run and at least we’ve turned a bit of a corner with Sellers; so this season is already a win for us.

Clemson just beats us plain and simple. Maybe we can muster up some magic but it’ll be tough.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

I have a feeling my gamecocks are going to be over emotional and dare I say, reckless.

It’s been a good run and at least we’ve turned a bit of a corner with Sellers; so this season is already a win for us.

Clemson just beats us plain and simple. Maybe we can muster up some magic but it’ll be tough.

You probably have the best DLine in the country and a couple of explosive playmakers on O. 

I wouldn't be surprised at all if you win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

I have a feeling my gamecocks are going to be over emotional and dare I say, reckless.

It’s been a good run and at least we’ve turned a bit of a corner with Sellers; so this season is already a win for us.

Clemson just beats us plain and simple. Maybe we can muster up some magic but it’ll be tough.

I think the 1 win in recent history was because Dabo was emotional….and wanted to prove he could do a version of Beamer ball.   Instead of just beating yall boringly with Shipley that ole ego/jealously caught Dabo. 

I just want a fun game.  Hope the 2 QBs are having good days.  Both IMO have a tendency to run pretty hot/cold.  If one is cold, that teams is done for this weekend IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

I have a feeling my gamecocks are going to be over emotional and dare I say, reckless.

It’s been a good run and at least we’ve turned a bit of a corner with Sellers; so this season is already a win for us.

Clemson just beats us plain and simple. Maybe we can muster up some magic but it’ll be tough.

Man don't be a pussy, we are gonna woop some tiger ass, two  TD victory coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Man don't be a pussy, we are gonna woop some tiger ass, two  TD victory coming.

100% Gamecocks have a tremendous fanbase.  I would have abandoned Clemson long ago if they were basically the college equivalent of a Tepper run football team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I mean, the ACC is definitely nowhere near as strong as the SEC and Big 10. That's just reality.

I’m curious as to why you say this?  You know the ACC won the head to head last year…right?  7-5.  You think that because you’ve been feed that for years.  I wouldn’t be surprised if the ACC wins head to head again this year.  Not to mention, the SEC hasn’t been the top conference in bowl games for a few years now, they are not what we’ve all been told.  It’s easy to win a bunch of nattys when fat guys smoking cigars in a room, paid for by the SEC committee puts you in the championship game ever year.  Just look at last year, and Alabama was 1 and done…but money talks

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, therealmjl said:

I have a feeling my gamecocks are going to be over emotional and dare I say, reckless.

It’s been a good run and at least we’ve turned a bit of a corner with Sellers; so this season is already a win for us.

Clemson just beats us plain and simple. Maybe we can muster up some magic but it’ll be tough.

I think they are going to beat up Clemson and win by few scores.  I will go 31-20 SC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...