Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

no no no.  The 6th best SEC team is better than the best of every other conference.  SEC just built different! 

I'm on the record saying that the only SEC team that should have slid in there was SC. Any one with eyes could see alabama sucked the last six weeks, no one wanted admit it cause brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

UM D line is destroying alabama, and their big prospects aren’t in. makes you wonder if any of the success of those two is due to scheme.

Oooooor

The same Alabama who couldn’t score a TD.  And had less rushing yards for an entire game than Navy’s QB had on 1 play vs Oklahoma 

was just over hyped by that 4 letter network.  Who owns the broadcasting rights for the playoff and that conference 

Edited by ncfan
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Oooooor

The same Alabama who couldn’t score a TD.  And had less rushing yards for an entire game than Navy’s QB had on 1 play vs Oklahoma 

was just over hyped by that 4 letter network.  Who owns the broadcasting rights for the playoff and that conference 

 ESPN flat out doing embarrassing work this year for the SEC and Colorado.   ESPN basically Fox News/CNN of sports. 

Herbstreit went from loved to rightfully viewed as a clown this year.  But that's what you get when you become a shill. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

I'm on the record saying that the only SEC team that should have slid in there was SC. Any one with eyes could see alabama sucked the last six weeks, no one wanted admit it cause brand.

I mean, props to SC for having a good season and surprising folks.   Don't get me wrong.  It was a good year.  And I have always been pro Beamer despite the poo talk.  But the narrative was gassed up at the end just like it was for all SEC to an extent.  I mean, the team that finished the season was talked about like they thumping teams on the head to close out the year. 

SC squeaked by Clemson in the closing minute to win an ugly game.  They squeaked by Mizzu in the closing seconds to win another.  And they looked meh for a half against Wofford.  That was the end of their season.   Talking heads were talking like SC was putting folks teeth on the curb.  Everyone terrified of them.  Gassed up.  Everyone on the cusp out there overselling.  But that's the name of the game I guess.  SEC benefits from having ESPN sell them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...