Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Sure, if they had comparable talent they wouldn’t have lost any games. They had a cupcake schedule. Putting Arizona State in the playoff over teams like Alabama or Miami is a joke. 

maybe they could of given Miami Tenn’s spot.  Tenn has been the most clowned team in the CFP so far.  THAT was an at large spot the committee could have done what they wanted with.  

Don’t see the point of complaining about conference champs outside of seeding.  The committee is not choosing them or giving them a spot. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CRA said:

If ASU had comparable on the line talent to Tex…I might like them in this game.  If Boise State had comparable talent I the lines to Penn St I think they would have won.   Deion Sanders was right about one thing. It’s the lines.  That’s the difference. 

QBs in a vacuum? Lot of the favorites got overrated dudes.  

It's always been the biggest difference between the elites and all the rest in the college game. The blue chip programs are just dominant in the trenches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I would like to have ghat kid Scaterbo or however you spell. He doesn't give and it takes 5 guys to bring him down.

He’d be a good short yardage back for sure. Mike Alstott style. He’s “vomiting profusely” on the sideline right now though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I would like to have ghat kid Scaterbo or however you spell. He doesn't give and it takes 5 guys to bring him down.

Kinda reminded me of Tolbert. A quick read says fumbles are a concern as is the workload he's been getting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Other things - I agree could get him fired one day. However, not drafting a tight end this year is not going to be any reason. DC couldn't really do much with how many of the tight ends most of us figured would be around day 3 went day 2. Tight ends I would have liked for us to get day three like Delp, Roush, and Raridon went in the 3rd. I think we were smart not joining that tight end Rush and instead focused on a receiver that was great value where we got him in the 3rd round.
    • He so is far from being what people claimed he was.   What he was, is we hope and pray for consistently average in year 4. That’s what he is.  We should just move on if that’s the best he can be.   
    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
×
×
  • Create New...