Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Saints Game Week 1


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

Thats cool. But the other side to this is that there MUST be positive results to this. No more blaming the team, the coaches, the "situation". None of that now because the situation is tailored made for you. Bryce has to perform, if you're getting to play freely now because everything is designed just for you opposed to last year there is no reason we should see the same player this year looking like a deer in headlights at times, making costly mistakes, and not willing to take chances. Thats just what it is. Thats a unbiased viewpoint.

Edited by CPF4LIFE
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Thats cool. But the other side to this is that there MUST be positive results to this. No more blaming the team, the coaches, the "situation". None of that now because the situation is tailored made for you. Bryce has to perform, if you're getting to play freely now because everything is designed just for you opposed to last year there is no reason we should see the same player this year looking like a deer in headlights at times, making costly mistakes, and not willing to take chances. Thats just what it is. Thats an unbiased viewpoint.

Agree

Which also means if Bryce doesn’t show significant progress then we move on after this year. There would be nothing left to see if he still struggles with an offense tailored to his strengths

  • Beer 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Sure will be more refreshing than Reich's Screen, Slant, Screen. 

It was more along the lines of screen, curl route, curl route.  Where the receivers don't get open and then just stand there.

Edited by Tr3ach
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RumHam said:

IMO Bryce's natural playmaking instincts were neutered under Frank Reich. He was not playing freely.

 

means jack fugin poo

Truthfully...I dont buy it but it is what it is.  I don't think a number 1 pick needs this much accommodation to perform but we will see wont we. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

30 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Trust me, when we struggle to move the ball threw the air again it will go back to "receivers just can't get open".

 

 

And the OL. And the coaching. And haterz.

I think it's going noticeably better, just because that OL is upgraded for the run game. That's going to help. 

Better enough to really look like an NFL offense? Not sure... looks to me like it is going to look more like the Alabama offense. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Ehhhh I’m good friend with a saints fan that travels from Charlotte to NO for home games and even he said the dome is starting to feel the same effects we have with apathy. No where near as much as a home field advantage compared to 17-18 years 

Thanks for the update, along with Jake delhommie, it seems MANY iants fans are not happy about the team. I didn't know it was that bad, but having Dennis Allen and his 7-10 seasons will turn some fans off. 

20 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

If Bryce still looks like a school boy playing against grown men then yes our only way to win is running the ball.....

If Bryce steps up and can make the plays that need to be made we can win in other ways....

If BY has a good game, it will come down to a one score type game. 

My opinion has changed some, iants fans are close to Panthers fans about not liking their team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, strato said:

 

And the OL. And the coaching. And haterz.

I think it's going noticeably better, just because that OL is upgraded for the run game. That's going to help. 

Better enough to really look like an NFL offense? Not sure... looks to me like it is going to look more like the Alabama offense. 

Nick Saban said they pretty much how to change the whole offense to accommodate bryce and yes he had success and one a heisman. Whether that will translate to pros is another story. For the record, from what I watched I just didn't like the offense they ran with bryce. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, strato said:

 

And the OL. And the coaching. And haterz.

I think it's going noticeably better, just because that OL is upgraded for the run game. That's going to help. 

Better enough to really look like an NFL offense? Not sure... looks to me like it is going to look more like the Alabama offense. 

If it looks like the Alabama vs Texas offense we're in for another long season. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...