Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Panthers cut Chaisson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I believe no matter what, chaisson counts 1,000,000 towards the -8,000,000.

Dan jerks around mathews for 24hrs and now at the thinnest position group he waives a guy that's been here all off-season. It's like Dan doesn't know how to gm currently. 

As a whole, Fitterer said he sat down with assistant general manager Dan Morgan and went through the whole roster, position by position, comparing it to the 2022 edition. 

For the most part, they drew positives.

"We had mostly positive, a couple equals; there was one negative," Fitterer said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

As a whole, Fitterer said he sat down with assistant general manager Dan Morgan and went through the whole roster, position by position, comparing it to the 2022 edition. 

For the most part, they drew positives.

"We had mostly positive, a couple equals; there was one negative," Fitterer said.

I just said yesterday that I changed my mind about Morgan not being fitterereerer;s right hand man. 

 

Here we are -8,00,000 before week one and Morgan cuts a guy at the thinnest spot and counts 1 million in dead, just why the constant fails??

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Does this team hate Jordan Matthews or something? Geez! Get a pass rusher or another quick twitch WR in case Diontae goes down.

 

42 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Already have the most productive TE from training camp on the PS, but you know an injured Ian Thomas is too important. 

Matthews has been on the Active Roster since last Thursday.

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I just said yesterday that I changed my mind about Morgan not being fitterereerer;s right hand man. 

 

Here we are -8,00,000 before week one and Morgan cuts a guy at the thinnest spot and counts 1 million in dead, just why the constant fails??

Said it before, will say it again, we are fuged, guys. Morgan is more of the same, see how his "sign-offs" are working so far?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 33inNC said:

Said it before, will say it again, we are fuged, guys. Morgan is more of the same, see how his "sign-offs" are working so far?  

I swear I thought over the weekend Morgan didn't like roster, thus how was he fittterereres' right hand guy??

Then todays news hits and Im thinking why did he claim a ST LB for 3,000,000 among other if you're that close to the cap? Plus just gave 1,000,000 to Cut player.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...