Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Saints Game Day Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

No

That's the same thing as when we fired Rhule and I said it was a mistake to do it at the time, because it only would improve the team.

We're not contending this year, just take our lumps and get a good draft pick.  No point in playing Dalton so we can be a 6-11 team and end up in no man's land in the draft where we won't get a truly elite prospect.

Bryce needs to be our starter for the full season and possibly even next year as well since this is a weak QB class.  Draft a non QB elite prospect, spend another year building up young talent, suck again next year with Bryce and then draft someone like Arch Manning with the 1st pick in 2026.

Yep. Roll with Young to the 1st pick unless he pulls a Collins and quits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tukafan21 said:

No

That's the same thing as when we fired Rhule and I said it was a mistake to do it at the time, because it only would improve the team.

We're not contending this year, just take our lumps and get a good draft pick.  No point in playing Dalton so we can be a 6-11 team and end up in no man's land in the draft where we won't get a truly elite prospect.

Bryce needs to be our starter for the full season and possibly even next year as well since this is a weak QB class.  Draft a non QB elite prospect, spend another year building up young talent, suck again next year with Bryce and then draft someone like Arch Manning with the 1st pick in 2026.

Yeah but another 2-15 season and good luck getting any FA to sign here. You’ll have nothing but rookies that are disappointed they were drafted by us. Besides, leaving Bryce in limits the offense and the development of people like Legette, Sanders, Mingo because the offense is limited. Change the QB and give the guys something to play for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol can't make this up. 3rd and 19 so let's draw a PI to let them move the chains. You know what, the D gets a pass as PeeWee can't keep the saints offense off the field. At some point if that little crook gets to keep screwing up and playing, they are all going to say fug it cause they won't do anything to PeeWee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...