Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would You Get a QB in 2025 draft, or not??


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I'm really not a huge fan of this class. Cam Ward is interesting but don't think he's worth a top 10 pick. Milroe is similar. If either of those guys were available in the second though I'd highly consider it 

I don't think I want Milroe, at all, at more than a bargain basement deal. 5th round flier like Rattler? Okay, no issue at all with that.  

Haven't watched Ward but isn't he at the low end of the allowable height slot? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Panther53521 said:

The Darnold thought is very interestingl.

We need someone like Darnold, vet QB that can lead the team while the new QB sits and learns

I would guess they offer Darnold 2 years if he keeps playing like he is. Sit McCarthy, let him get fully healed, and let him learn like Love did. 

Plus, other than money, why would he want to come here. He's seen toxic Tepperball in action. I can't imagine he'd want to come back to Carolina unless no one else offered him a FA contract or Dave was willing to shell out 4yr/200m guaranteed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, strato said:

I don't think I want Milroe, at all, at more than a bargain basement deal. 5th round flier like Rattler? Okay, no issue at all with that.  

Haven't watched Ward but isn't he at the low end of the allowable height slot? 

6'2"

Nothing wrong with that. No, that's not Cam but there's plenty of examples of successful 6'2" QBs. It's not like he's 5'9" 175.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

6'2"

Nothing wrong with that. No, that's not Cam but there's plenty of examples of successful 6'2" QBs. It's not like he's 5'9" 175.

Is he actually a bona fide 6'2", is sort of my point. 

Like Bryce, at 204 pounds and 5'10' without the hair.

I don't like that so much in the top 5 or wherever. At the same time, I would back a (unpressured by Tepper) Canales selection, as he is owed his quarterback to coach for his job with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Too early IMO.   Take Milroe.  It could keep going south this year.  And then what is he? 

I think Carolina likely gets a top 3 pick and should draft back for picks 

(Oops I take back the not that high, I missed the trade back part.)

No Milroe. Not that high. Haven't we fuging learned about this Alabama poo? 

I watched him Saturday. Not impressed. People watch a lot of college ball and form attachments to guys that they shouldn't. He is better than Bryce but so what? 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Too early IMO.   Take Milroe.  It could keep going south this year.  And then what is he? 

I think Carolina likely gets a top 3 pick and should draft back for picks 

Hell no to Milroe in the 1st. He's more of a project QB.

 

I'm all in on Travis Hunter unless we end up with the #1 pick.

 

Teams like Jacksonville/New England will definitely be a threat to draft Hunter. If we going to rebuild our defense you start with Hunter he's the best talent on defense.

 

I'm not drafting a QB #1. We trade that to Vegas and let them give up the farm for Sanders.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, strato said:

Is he actually a bona fide 6'2", is sort of my point. 

Like Bryce, at 204 pounds and 5'10' without the hair.

I don't like that so much in the top 5 or wherever. At the same time, I would back a (unpressured by Tepper) Canales selection, as he is owed his quarterback to coach for his job with.

You would've missed Patrick Mahomes then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

They could still take a qb first and use rest of the picks on defense and FA agency money.  It's not like they have to spend on offense this off season outside of Johnson if they even choose to keep him.

If you take a QB you take the best prospect. The best QB is Sanders. Reaching on guys like Ward and Milroe is a massive gamble. We all know Sanders wouldn't like coming here. So you trade the #1 pick to the highest bidder and go from there.

 

We play our cards right we could come away with a great offer just like the Bears did to us. That's how you rebuild a team.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...