Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Kaye: Panthers might start Bryce Young final 7 games

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

With all due respect 7 games isn't going to make or break Johnson's career. He's already a hot name in trade rumors. 

 

If Bryce is bad we simply move on. The season is already over my man.

 

Aren't you ready to move on from this Bryce speculation?

Again, it’s not about making or breaking anyone’s career. I don’t get what is so hard to understand. Thielen was showing signs of irritation in the first two games of the year. It wasn’t about losing. It wasn’t about stats. It was all the times either he was open and ignored or the ball was thrown at his feet/over his head.  Any competitor wants to be given a chance to compete, whether that’s game to game or play to play, they want balls they can catch. Not for stats, for personal satisfaction. That has a huge impact on morale.  
 

and there is no “if”. I’ve long moved on from Bryce speculation, as most have. No one needs to see seven more games to confirm what is already painfully obvious. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Gapanthersfan said:

Bryce’s limitations are physical.  No amount of standing on the sideline will change that. Players, fans… everyone knows that. The media wants the sideshow to continue so they throw this out to try to influence the team’s actions. 

Dave doing this is a big F all of you to the locker room. Bryce is a completely embarrassing, mostly on him guaranteed L where 10 fans show up to the stadium and the sideshow can continue.

Andy is a probable L where he shoulders some blame but he will perform as an NFL qb should. We are guaranteed to see at least a few ‘hell yes’ type plays where WRs look like actual WRs. 

Bryce gets the start and keeps playing? You will have guys up for contracts extensions who can’t wait to jump ship, regardless of the $. Keep Andy and draft a guy who actually flashes ability. 

There is 0.0 to gain putting BY in. He is gone either way. What, so we might, but probably not, get his trade value up from a 6th to a 3rd? What’s to gain? There is no gain. 

This either an attempt to keep this team a complete clown show or an even more desperate by the Stans to show that they weren’t wrong. 

I agree with you except one point: Bryce’s limitations are all of the above. Physical, mental and even emotional. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Again, it’s not about making or breaking anyone’s career. I don’t get what is so hard to understand. Thielen was showing signs of irritation in the first two games of the year. It wasn’t about losing. It wasn’t about stats. It was all the times either he was open and ignored or the ball was thrown at his feet/over his head.  Any competitor wants to be given a chance to compete, whether that’s game to game or play to play, they want balls they can catch. Not for stats, for personal satisfaction. That has a huge impact on morale.  
 

and there is no “if”. I’ve long moved on from Bryce speculation, as most have. No one needs to see seven more games to confirm what is already painfully obvious. 

I can respect this opinion. I can understand your point of view. I'm just speaking for me. I wouldn't be happy if I'm getting the ball or not. I hate losing.

Edited by CamWhoaaCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The vast majority of these types of articles are speculation.  Writers have to produce content, its what they do.  Nothing real to write about, so they put out rumor they heard. Or in some cases, a rumor they started.  

Fwiw, it’s possible that they trade Bryce.  It’s possible that they keep him and don't play him.  It’s possible that they keep him and do play him. 

Yeah, I know. It is just frustrating when some of these articles titles sound like actual rumor to get you to read it and then when you do you realize that the writer has no idea and is just making stuff up. 
For some reason the media want Bryce to start again because Dalton has gotten boring. Even though if his one series against the Bears were any indication. Nothing changed and he still sucks. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

With all due respect 7 games isn't going to make or break Johnson's career. He's already a hot name in trade rumors. 

 

If Bryce is bad we simply move on. The season is already over my man.

 

Aren't you ready to move on from this Bryce speculation?

My view is that the time for speculating is long past. The evidence is clear.

And chasing your losses trying to recoup is just bad policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Y’all really let Juan/Bryce get your blood pressure up.

yeah. I admit it, it is true. Just playing him in garbage time against a prevent starts the Bryce media lobby and stan machine up again.  Had more than enough.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, strato said:

My view is that the time for speculating is long past. The evidence is clear.

And chasing your losses trying to recoup is just bad policy.

Then why are we leaving the door open to a possible return?

 

If he's not the guy make it clear. Trade him. Otherwise he's just killing whatever little value he has sitting on the bench. I'm honestly sick of seeing the lil bastard smiling on the sidelines. 

 

A real competitor would be fighting for his job. No smiles, no laughing. We are losing games nothing should be funny on the sidelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Then why are we leaving the door open to a possible return?

 

If he's not the guy make it clear. Trade him. Otherwise he's just killing whatever little value he has sitting on the bench. I'm honestly sick of seeing the lil bastard smiling on the sidelines. 

 

A real competitor would be fighting for his job. No smiles, no laughing. We are losing games nothing should be funny on the sidelines.

It isn't 'we' afaic.

I would have no answer for it. Besides Snow's thoughts on appeasing Tepper. 

I am obviously where you are. But I'd rather see his narrow ass on the sidelines than on the field looking like a high school player that won the NFL QB for a day contest.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Yeah, I know. It is just frustrating when some of these articles titles sound like actual rumor to get you to read it and then when you do you realize that the writer has no idea and is just making stuff up. 
For some reason the media want Bryce to start again because Dalton has gotten boring. Even though if his one series against the Bears were any indication. Nothing changed and he still sucks. 

Got it

I couldn't help but laugh when people talked Bryce in the Bears game. He threw ok in garbage time until the got in the red zone. But then he failed.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Martin Grand Master

Martin

Posted
Posted

The question is (it is not really a question tbh), do you want to develop the young WRs and TEs, or do you want to give it another go with Bryce? These are two mutually exclusive options.

Developing WRs and TEs is the no brainer answer. Bryce is who he is, no playtime will change that, he is not part of our future.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Houston Texans... You Suck!!!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • tukafan21
      Houston Texans... You Suck!!!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • CanadianCat
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...