Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Canales is one and done.... part 2.


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

It’s a difficult position to be in trying to defend this team at any level, roster, coaching, front office or ownership.  I’m not even sure what needs to be fixed first because I’m not sure you can fix both the roster and coaching at the same time.

We either go cheap on the roster while trying to put together a competent staff/front office combo or we stick with the staff we have and retool the roster?

Continuity has to come from somewhere.  We can’t have constant change in all phases of this organization.

If I had to guess I’d say keep Canales and give him a chance to build the roster the way he wants.  QB being the most important position, he at least deserves to put “his” guy out there.  Best we can hope for is that he learns from his mistakes and figures it out.

The roster is so bad it’s going to take multiple years just to get back to a baseline of average starter talent with some competent back ups.  And that will require a competent FO… good lord we may never be good again.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Again, no one forced him to take the job. and again, no one else considered him for it. 

What coach that we interviewed this cycle would have succeeded with fixing Bryce?  Because it’s pretty clear that was a term of accepting the job and the organization was already committed to going this direction given the previous investment we made in him. And hey, he probably thought that there was some small chance that building up the little guys confidence like Mike McDaniel did for Tua would pay off, but it was pretty clear after game 2 that he realized it’s just not going to happen. He’s already told us he’s put Bryce back in blowouts to make sure that his 36 year old journeyman doesn’t  get hurt unnecessarily, which is the same thing as saying that IDGAF if this 23 year old number one overall pick gets Alex smithed on the artificial turf at BOA.

 

Edited by X-Clown
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

I work nights at the hospital and sometimes I have easy nights. 

what’s your reason for being awake at 1130?

It's not that late? Heck I didn't crack a beer open until 9:30. PM. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Yeah but we’ll never know what actually happened with reich, because I think at this point we all agree no former nfl player would have met Bryce and drafted him. 

I would 'so' love to hear Reich's version of the truth. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...