Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rookie Tracking - Some Good Signs


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 11/5/2024 at 3:57 PM, thennek said:

How long will Tepper really keep away is the question….and has he really gotten away. 

Y’all spent way too much time worried about Tepper. I don’t think he’s any more involved than any other owner.

There was a time when 49er fans used to talk about Jed York this way, then he hired the right people now you don’t even know that he exist.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/3/2024 at 10:13 PM, jb2288 said:

Yeah still blows my mind people on here say that after what he did in 1 offseason. Im not proclaiming him the savior or anything but what he’s done in 1 offseason was impressive and it’s really not even close. Filled major holes and drafted what seems pretty well 8 games in. Flipped a 7th into a starting CB, drafted what seems to be a future legit 1/2 WR combo, someone got us a 2nd next year (that was some black magic poo), no stupid cap decisions to date. Excited to see what he does this year 

Anyone not impressed by what Dan Morgan has done so far is either willfully ignorant or just has been so scarred by the last 7 years that they instinctively think everything is bad.

This already looks like one of the best drafts in franchise history, and we needed worse than anything given the state of the roster Fitterer left.

Hell, it's not hyperbole to say DM got more out of this draft than everyone of Fitterers combined

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

Imagine if we have a defensive draft next year that's just as good...

By no means saying this will happen, but 2 drafts like that is how you go from one of the worst teams in the league to a contender.

It's also why this bullshit of needing 7 years to rebuild is just that...

You can completely change the trajectory of a team in the modern NFL in 2 years max if you have the right GM, coach, and QB

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/3/2024 at 8:35 PM, Bear Hands said:

First off, I know, it's just stats, but I do think there's been enough shown to warrant some love here--

Here's what they are tracking/on-pace for in 17-games this year.  And honestly, it could be more given the rookie receivers are now getting more target share:

 

R1 Xavier Legette WR

48 rec, 459 yards, 9.4 avg, 8 TDs

He's fun.  He's got a nose for the ball in the RZ.  Has proven he can get open at this level.  Happy to have my suspicions on him proven wrong.  

 

R2 Jonathan Brooks RB

zilch - okay...expected here lol

 

R3 Trevin Wallace LB

81 tackle, 53 solo, 4 FFs, 2 FRs

He's got some work to do but he's shown a lot for being thrust into the role he has this early.  Some promise here -- don't let the volume fool you, there's some development to be had, but he could make strides under the right mentors/coaching.  

 

R4 Ja'Tavion Sanders TE

45 rec, 462 yards, 10.1 avg- no TDs yet but I imagine he'll get one

He had his best game so far today.  He showed a lot of fire and I like the whole report I'm seeing grow between JT and XL.  Those two are buds and could be good here.  Has already shown more than most of our drafted TEs in the 2000s.    

 

R5 Chau Smith-Wade NB

34 tackles, 17 solo

He's had some blunders, but has also played alright at times.  Better than others we've experimented with at NB but may not stick.  Still, good to see him getting snaps and he landed 5 tackles today.    

 

UDFA Jalen Coker WR

40 rec 629 yards 15.9 avg 3 TDs 

A legitimate sleeper we may have found - he wasn't active/given snaps until CHI so he he's pacing higher.  Awesome route running, knows how to create leverage, just a really smart player.  

*edit: add

UDFA Demani Richardson DB

41 tackles, 27 solo

I’ll admit wasn’t entirely keyed in on him last week — he had a series where they tried to pick on him and he held his own. He’s shown nicely. He gets after it quickly

 

One of my rules is to not judge the rookie class until the start of their 2nd season week 1. But early returns are looking great even with nothing from brooks. The UDFAs haul of Coker, Richardardson, and even raym is MUCH welcomed injection of talent. There's still a couple others hanging around in - Plum and Johnson's. 

these wavier claims are rookies too- Bratholomew, Kingston.

With the Dalton, and whole STs being FAs for the coming 2025, this team could be one of the youngest given the draft picks. 

Crumedy is back with brooks this week, good to give them exp in this 2-7 season. 

 

So all that added and if you make me break a rule, Morgan did great especially with UDFAs and wavier claims. 

FYI the 7th rounder Michael Barret that was traded for Michael Jackson, Seahawks cut him weeks ago and he landed on brown PS. Morgan got more value, props to him. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Seltzer said:

Anyone not impressed by what Dan Morgan has done so far is either willfully ignorant or just has been so scarred by the last 7 years that they instinctively think everything is bad.

This already looks like one of the best drafts in franchise history, and we needed worse than anything given the state of the roster Fitterer left.

Hell, it's not hyperbole to say DM got more out of this draft than everyone of Fitterers combined

I’m starting to think DM got the job by showing Tepper his draft lists. I bet he nailed some pro bowl players that were never on Fitts radar 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Dan Morgan, I don’t see this team trying to get cute or gimmicky talent, and I especially don’t see him REACHING for gimmicky tweeners. 

Football

Players

If he can get guys in his image, we’ll be rolling. 

I also don’t subscribe to the multi year plan to rebuild. If you hit a couple drafts just right… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

I’m starting to think DM got the job by showing Tepper his draft lists. I bet he nailed some pro bowl players that were never on Fitts radar 

I like the thinking but have to ask, you think he had those notarized in anticipation? 

Okay kidding but if Tepper is as involved as people think he would know who Morgan liked. 

Also, if Tepper would have been happy with everything Morgan had done in cahoots with Fitterer, well he already had it and fired it. So I think there has to be some divergence from Fitterer somewhere in the timeline, or he wouldn't be here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, strato said:

I like the thinking but have to ask, you think he had those notarized in anticipation? 

Okay kidding but if Tepper is as involved as people think he would know who Morgan liked. 

Also, if Tepper would have been happy with everything Morgan had done in cahoots with Fitterer, well he already had it and fired it. So I think there has to be some divergence from Fitterer somewhere in the timeline, or he wouldn't be here. 

Yeah exactly. Nothing as formal as a list but say DM was advocating for Stroud and Fitt Bryce. DM Puka and Fitt Mingo. That would probably stick with Tepp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...