Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales still not sold on Bryce?


Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

If they were sold on him and really wanted him to be the starter then they would have already said so.  
 

Remember, these dudes have a paycheck wrapped up in winning football games. It’s also become evident that we have a lot of dudes not ok with losing. Andy is going to get healthy eventually and everyone knows he’s 10x the qb BY will ever be. Name BY the new starter… naw dog. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

I mean Bryce still doesn’t pass the eye test. He’s made some better throws since he was benched I’ll give him that. But there’s just not a lot of zip on the ball and he still struggles to make routine throws in rhythm. 

I think we are currently watching his ceiling, which is about 100 air yards a game, relying on either tons of yac from your skill players or multiple turnovers on defense to keep the game in reach. Oh yeah and Chuba can't run for 150 yards a game forever. He's playing at a Kyle Allen/PJ Walker level and the optics got so bad recently that people are somehow ok with it. Crazy that we ditched Teddy just to spend 4 years going through all these trades and everything just to end up basically in the same place. I think Teddy actually could throw a better deep ball if asked, just wasn't in his nature to. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CRA said:

I don't think Canales has the real say.  I think Bryce's benching after week 2 was Tepper (100%).  The only way to explain such a hard 180 after the Monday meeting from Sunday.   I think what to do going forward is Tepper......and that's why Canales forever struggles with basic questions. 

I think you are never going to get an answer saying a change like that is happening in a Sunday post game press conference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

It doesn't really matter which one starts but the fact Canales doesn't say who's starting the next game is kinda odd. I'm not sure what the benefit is in not saying who's starting. The Chiefs will not have to change anything no matter who's behind center. Maybe he's still trying to convince Andy to start? I know I wouldn't want to be the sacrificial lamb to go against those guys.

I think the answer is easy.   Because he doesn't have to.  Fans and media think they are due way more in these press conferences than they are.  Everything said should pretty much be taken with a grain of salt.  You're going to get 99% coach speak and then maybe an occasional slip up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Not even Dan Snyder was that insane.

I am sure Dave had to pitch a case to Tepper in his weekly meeting but I don't think it was a hard sell. I am not sure it will be a tough sell to bench Bryce again, either.

They could have each had "Andy time" written down on a piece of paper and revealed them simultaneously. And they agreed!

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

I think we are currently watching his ceiling, which is about 100 air yards a game, relying on either tons of yac from your skill players or multiple turnovers on defense to keep the game in reach. Oh yeah and Chuba can't run for 150 yards a game forever. He's playing at a Kyle Allen/PJ Walker level and the optics got so bad recently that people are somehow ok with it. Crazy that we ditched Teddy just to spend 4 years going through all these trades and everything just to end up basically in the same place. I think Teddy actually could throw a better deep ball if asked, just wasn't in his nature to. 

1 year plus 7 games in and he’s “reached his ceiling” is honestly kind of a crazy statement. 

After the first two games his ceiling would have been 33rd best qb in the league” and it certainly isn’t that right now. Give the dude a chance to keep earning his starting job instead of writing him off after a year and some change. 


He made some incredible throws the last couple games and some head scratching decisions. That’s what happens when you are a young quarterback. Yea he isn’t CJ Stroud or Jayden Daniels yet and he may never be. But he is not done cooking and is still in the evolution stage and that usually takes YEARS. If you want to give up on him and draft another qb and go through the exact same process in 3 years if they aren’t Daniel’s/Stroud lookalikes then that is your opinion and I’m glad you aren’t the GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LelouchBritannia said:

1 year plus 7 games in and he’s “reached his ceiling” is honestly kind of a crazy statement. 

After the first two games his ceiling would have been 33rd best qb in the league” and it certainly isn’t that right now. Give the dude a chance to keep earning his starting job instead of writing him off after a year and some change. 


He made some incredible throws the last couple games and some head scratching decisions. That’s what happens when you are a young quarterback. Yea he isn’t CJ Stroud or Jayden Daniels yet and he may never be. But he is not done cooking and is still in the evolution stage and that usually takes YEARS. If you want to give up on him and draft another qb and go through the exact same process in 3 years if they aren’t Daniel’s/Stroud lookalikes then that is your opinion and I’m glad you aren’t the GM.

do you think the raiders should have given up on Russell, do you think the cardinals should have given up on rosen?  How about Wilson for the jets?  I mean all of those dudes at one point or another  had "Incredible" throws during games, so were those teams in the wrong moving away from those guys?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have seen what he can do with the football, I think is what people are referring to as his ceiling. 

Whatever he does with that ability, that's maybe another thing. These weren't really stiff challenges the last couple of weeks, and we could not do enough to win that game in the second half. It was given away by the Giants in OT. 

Right now he is doing about like I expected which is why I picked us for 5 or 6 wins I forget. And yes I knew the defense was not going to help us much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

do you think the raiders should have given up on Russell, do you think the cardinals should have given up on rosen?  How about Wilson for the jets?  I mean all of those dudes at one point or another  had "Incredible" throws during games, so were those teams in the wrong moving away from those guys?

1st year til the next November is literally the leash for most drafted qb's lol. Plus I was talking more about physical ceiling. Like great he didn't throw picks because he knows what throws he can't make anymore. He's not going to get more velocity or better at qb scrambles etc. I'm not sure what more he can improve on given the circumstances

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...